Back

Exploring the Intersectionality of Marital Status and Sex on Survival Outcomes in Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma

Akinyemi, O.; Fasokun, M.; Ogunyankin, F.; Eze, A.; Abodunrin, F.; Ogbuehi, C.; Ugarte, A.; Hughes, K. A.; Michael, M.; Abobarin-Aofolaju, O.

2025-03-01 hematology
10.1101/2025.02.27.25322996 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNon-Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) remains a significant public health concern with notable disparities in survival outcomes. Sex and marital status are two critical social determinants that influence both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Prior studies suggest that women with NHL face poorer survival outcomes compared to men, and marital status modulates survival, with married individuals demonstrating better outcomes. However, the interplay between sex and marital status on NHL survival has not been thoroughly examined. ObjectiveTo investigate the combined effects of sex and marital status on CSS and OS in NHL patients. MethodologyA retrospective cohort study was conducted using SEER registry data spanning 2000 to 2020. Individuals aged 18-85 diagnosed with NHL were included. Cox regression models assessed the interaction between sex and marital status on CSS and OS, adjusting for covariates such as age, race, household income, cancer stage, and treatment modalities. Predicted probabilities of mortality and the differences in sex effects across marital status categories were estimated using interaction terms and linear combinations. ResultsA total of 291,608 patients were included, with females accounting for 54.6% of the cohort. Sex disparities were observed across marital status groups. Married women exhibited a significantly higher probability of overall mortality than married men (9.26, 95% CI: 7.61-10.92, p < 0.001). The disparity was most pronounced among single individuals, where women had a 22.93-unit higher probability of overall mortality compared to men (95% CI: 18.49-27.37, p < 0.001). Similarly, widowed women had higher probabilities of mortality than widowed men (13.10, 95% CI: 10.08-16.11, p < 0.001). Cancer-specific mortality followed a similar pattern, with single women experiencing the greatest disparity compared to single men (8.44, 95% CI: 6.21-10.68, p < 0.001). Comparisons of effects between marital status groups revealed that single individuals exhibited a 13.67-unit greater disparity in overall mortality than married individuals (95% CI: 10.26-17.07, p < 0.001). ConclusionThis study underscores the significant influence of sex and marital status on survival outcomes in NHL patients. Women face higher cancer-specific and overall mortality risks across all marital status categories. Marital status modifies these disparities, with marriage conferring a survival advantage, particularly for men. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address sex and social disparities in NHL outcomes, emphasizing the importance of social support and tailored survivorship care. Key PointsO_LIWomen with NHL have higher overall and cancer-specific mortality than men, with the greatest disparity seen in single individuals. C_LIO_LIMarriage reduces survival disparities, benefiting men most, while single and widowed women face the highest mortality risks. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
3
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
7
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
8
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
15
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%