Exploring the Intersectionality of Marital Status and Sex on Survival Outcomes in Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
Akinyemi, O.; Fasokun, M.; Ogunyankin, F.; Eze, A.; Abodunrin, F.; Ogbuehi, C.; Ugarte, A.; Hughes, K. A.; Michael, M.; Abobarin-Aofolaju, O.
Show abstract
IntroductionNon-Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) remains a significant public health concern with notable disparities in survival outcomes. Sex and marital status are two critical social determinants that influence both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Prior studies suggest that women with NHL face poorer survival outcomes compared to men, and marital status modulates survival, with married individuals demonstrating better outcomes. However, the interplay between sex and marital status on NHL survival has not been thoroughly examined. ObjectiveTo investigate the combined effects of sex and marital status on CSS and OS in NHL patients. MethodologyA retrospective cohort study was conducted using SEER registry data spanning 2000 to 2020. Individuals aged 18-85 diagnosed with NHL were included. Cox regression models assessed the interaction between sex and marital status on CSS and OS, adjusting for covariates such as age, race, household income, cancer stage, and treatment modalities. Predicted probabilities of mortality and the differences in sex effects across marital status categories were estimated using interaction terms and linear combinations. ResultsA total of 291,608 patients were included, with females accounting for 54.6% of the cohort. Sex disparities were observed across marital status groups. Married women exhibited a significantly higher probability of overall mortality than married men (9.26, 95% CI: 7.61-10.92, p < 0.001). The disparity was most pronounced among single individuals, where women had a 22.93-unit higher probability of overall mortality compared to men (95% CI: 18.49-27.37, p < 0.001). Similarly, widowed women had higher probabilities of mortality than widowed men (13.10, 95% CI: 10.08-16.11, p < 0.001). Cancer-specific mortality followed a similar pattern, with single women experiencing the greatest disparity compared to single men (8.44, 95% CI: 6.21-10.68, p < 0.001). Comparisons of effects between marital status groups revealed that single individuals exhibited a 13.67-unit greater disparity in overall mortality than married individuals (95% CI: 10.26-17.07, p < 0.001). ConclusionThis study underscores the significant influence of sex and marital status on survival outcomes in NHL patients. Women face higher cancer-specific and overall mortality risks across all marital status categories. Marital status modifies these disparities, with marriage conferring a survival advantage, particularly for men. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address sex and social disparities in NHL outcomes, emphasizing the importance of social support and tailored survivorship care. Key PointsO_LIWomen with NHL have higher overall and cancer-specific mortality than men, with the greatest disparity seen in single individuals. C_LIO_LIMarriage reduces survival disparities, benefiting men most, while single and widowed women face the highest mortality risks. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Childhood Cancer Survival in the Highly Vulnerable Population of South Texas: A Cohort Study 95%
- Predictors of Interruptions in Antiretroviral Therapy among People Living with HIV in Nigeria: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Nigeria National Data Repository 92%
- End-of-life care in hematological malignancies – a nationwide comparative study on the Swedish Register of Palliative Care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association of child marriage with morbidities and mortality among children under 5 years in Afghanistan: Findings from a national survey 91%
- Tattoo ink exposure is associated with lymphoma and skin cancers – a Danish study of twins 89%
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Awareness, Acceptance and Associated Factors of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among Parents of Daughters in Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study 90%
- Social capital, urbanization level, and COVID-19 vaccination uptake in the United States: A national level analysis 90%
- Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Socio-demographics, Co-Morbidity and Past Experience of Racial Discrimination 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Retrospective Analysis of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Awards Under Executive Order 14168 on Gender Ideology in the U.S. 2012-2025 88%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rare diseases- A case study on thalassaemia patients in Bangladesh 88%
- Knowledge, attitude, and practices towards COVID-19 among the Rohingya refugees in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk and Outcome of Second primary malignancy in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma 93%
- Correlation Analysis of Breast Cancer Molecular Characteristics and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Circulating Tumor Cells: Based on Clinical Cases 90%
- Combination therapy of Tocilizumab and steroid for management of COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience from Pune, Western India 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.