Development and Implementation of a Minority Health International Infectious Diseases Research Training Program
Sy, A.; Taylor, D.; Leaungwutiwong, P.; Phanupak, N.; Sirida, Y.; Leke, R.; Humphrey, P. S.; Tandon, R.; Kulkarni, M.; Madhivanan, P.; Kaholokula, J. K.; Nerurkar, V. R.
Show abstract
From 2014-2019, the University of Hawai`i (UH) at Manoa offered a National Institutes of Health funded Minority Health International Research Training (MHIRT) Program for undergraduate research experiences in infectious diseases. The goal of the program was to immerse undergraduate students in conducting global infectious diseases research to train a new generation of scientists to combat future global pandemics. The MHIRT program trained educationally underrepresented groups unique in Hawai`i: Native Hawai`ians and other Pacific Islanders, and underrepresented Asian Americans, e.g., Filipinos and Vietnamese. A 12-member Advisory Committee guided the program development, implementation, recruitment strategies, recruitment, retention, and program evaluation. The program provided an eight-month classroom and field based international research training. Students learned about "8 steps of research" and cultural competency, experienced a hands-on research project abroad, and presented their results to the research community in the host country and at UH. Students research topics focused on ongoing projects of UH faculty including those with international collaborations in infectious disease and tropical medicine. Students spent two months on an international research mentors project at an international site under the mentorship of a Hawai`i based research faculty. After eight months, students graduated from the program by presenting their research to family, friends, mentors, and UH faculty and administrators. Trainees in this program pursued academic graduate or professional health degrees. The majority of students pursued further studies related to infectious diseases contributing to workforce development in infectious disease health research. The UH-MHIRT program provides an example of student immersion in international infectious disease research to foster future interest in global health research providing potential benefits for the student and faculty and their research efforts.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 94%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 94%
- Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs: a qualitative content analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- PROPEL: a scalable model for postbaccalaureate training to promote diversity in the biomedical workforce 94%
- Preprint peer review enhances undergraduate biology students' disciplinary literacy and sense of belonging in STEM 94%
- Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut MicrobiotAware: how much do we know about gut microbiota? An international questionnaire. 87%
- Studies on the level of neutralizing antibodies produced by inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in the real world 86%
- Development Of The Inactivated QazCovid-In Vaccine: Protective Efficacy Of The Vaccine In Syrian Hamsters 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
- Training Doctoral Students in Critical Thinking and Experimental Design using Problem-based Learning 92%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.