Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing Online Educational Interventions for Physicians: Systematic Review of Reviews
Tolegenova, A.; Kanderzhanova, A.; Foster, F.; Colet, P.; Stolyarova, V.; Sarria-Santamera, A.
Show abstract
The implementation of online educational interventions for physicians presents both barriers and facilitators that shape the integration of digital learning into medical education frameworks. This systematic review of reviews aims to synthesize evidence on factors influencing the successful implementation of online educational interventions for physicians. We conducted searches across databases including, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL spanning the years 2018 to 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised systematic reviews focusing on the implementation of e-learning. Data synthesis followed meta-ethnography principles, with categorization guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Twenty-one relevant reviews were analyzed, highlighting factors within the CFIR domains: Innovation, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, Individuals, and Implementation Process. Facilitators included evidence-based practices, adaptability, leadership engagement, and resource availability, while barriers encompassed limited funding, regulatory hurdles, technological constraints, and resistance to change. The results emphasize how crucial it is for healthcare institutions, policymakers, educators, and technology providers to work together in order to effectively incorporate online learning into medical education. In conclusion, the study highlights the importance of tailored implementation strategies and policy recommendations, utilizing evidence-based practices and addressing various factors, to enhance online medical educations effectiveness and ensure its integration into healthcare systems for improved patient outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experiences, challenges, and enablers for promoting interprofessional education among medical students: A Scoping Review 95%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 93%
- How the COVID-19 pandemic is favoring the adoption of digital technologies in healthcare: a literature review 93%
- Has the pandemic enhanced and sustained digital health-seeking behaviour? A big data interrupted time-series analysis of Google Trends 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 93%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.