Brain Aging Among Individuals with Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia
Cruz-Almeida, Y.; Valdes-Hernandez, P. A.; Liang, Y.; Ding, M.; Neubert, J. K.
Show abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a complex orofacial neuropathic pain condition with limited understanding of underlying mechanisms and therapeutic options. Emerging evidence suggests the involvement of the brain in persons with TN including widespread brain changes when employing a widely used brain aging biomarker that estimates a predicted brain age difference or brain age gap. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to assess the predicted brain age difference (brain-PAD) or brain age gap across two discrete TN subtypes (classical TN, and secondary/idiopathic TN) in comparison with age-and sex-matched pain-free controls and its association with several clinical and psychological characteristics. Thirty-four individuals diagnosed with Classical TN, 17 diagnosed with secondary/idiopathic TN were age- and sex-matched to pain-free controls (n=54). All participants underwent a T1 brain MRI and completed clinical and psychological measures. There were significant differences in brain-PAD among TN subtypes (ANCOVA p = 0.0078, effect size f2 = 0.282), with individuals diagnosed with Classical TN having a brain-PAD significantly greater than the controls by 3.87 years (p = 0.01, Bonferroni-corrected). There were no significant brain-PAD differences between secondary/idiopathic TN and pain-free controls. Brain-PAD had a significant positive association with both pain catastrophizing (p = 0.032) and pain-related anxiety (p = 0.041), but no significant association with disease duration (p = 0.519) or usual pain intensity (p = 0.443). We report here accelerated brain aging processes in patients with classical TN, but not in persons diagnosed with secondary/idiopathic TN. Our study replicates previous findings and adds to the literature that accelerated brain aging may not occur across all TN subtypes. Given the increased use of MRI for TN diagnostics, combined with our own recent work deriving our brain aging biomarker from clinical-grade scans, future studies within clinical settings are feasible and needed to understand this debilitating condition.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered Brain Responses to Noxious Dentoalveolar Stimuli in High-Impact Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Patients 92%
- Female Brain and Endocrinological Research – Veteran (FemBER-Vet) Study: A study protocol for identifying endocrinological, lifestyle and psychosocial determinants of brain health outcomes in female veterans for future intervention success 92%
- Hyper-connectivity between the left motor cortex and prefrontal cortex is associated with the severity of dysfunction of the descending pain modulatory system in fibromyalgia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regular Tai Chi Practice Is Associated with Improved Memory as well as Structural and Functional Integrity of the Hippocampal Formation in the Elderly 90%
- Differential relationships between brain structure and dual task walking in young and older adults 90%
- Phenotyping Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Profiles of Alzheimer's Disease Using Cluster Analysis on EEG Power 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pain Stickiness in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A role for the Nucleus Accumbens 93%
- Intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor as a model of temporomandibular disorder: nature, time-course, and sex differences characterising the pain experience 91%
- The impact of nerve injury on the immune system across the lifespan is sexually dimorphic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased MRI-based brain age in chronic migraine patients 93%
- Regional and whole-brain neurofunctional alterations during pain empathic processing of physical but not affective pain in migraine patients 93%
- Differential fMRI neural synchrony associated with migraine during naturalistic stimuli with negative emotional valence 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.