Back

Trends and Predictors of Outcomes of Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Very Elderly Patients.

Gilotra, K.; Janssen, M.; Zhang, X.; Mani, R.; Swarna, S.; Wang, C.; Dashti, R.

2024-06-28 surgery
10.1101/2024.06.27.24309617 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPrimary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is known to have poor management outcomes. Very elderly patients (age > 80) might have a significantly higher incidence of worse management morbidity and mortality after primary ICH. The aim of this study was to explore presenting status and pre-existing comorbidities in very elderly patients and compare the inpatient management outcomes with younger counterparts. MethodsThe Stony Brook ICH database is a retrospective cohort of 814 patients that presented with primary ICH from January 2011 to January 2021. Demographic data, presenting symptoms, pre-existing medical conditions, and imaging findings were recorded. Inpatient outcomes and functional state presented as modified Rankin Scale (MRS) at discharge were evaluated. ResultsOur results indicate very elderly patients had significantly higher baseline MRS and comorbidities such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and atrial fibrillation at presentation. Similarly, usage of statins, antiplatelets, and anticoagulants were significantly higher in this age group. Very elderly patients were also found to have higher average volume of hematoma at presentation. Our results indicate significantly higher discharge MRS, and inpatient mortality in the very elderly group. ConclusionPresent study demonstrates a wide variety of pre-existing factors that correlate with worse outcomes amongst very elderly patients presenting with primary ICH. Given the importance of aging population as a major healthcare issue in many parts of world, it is crucial to continue exploring these associations in future research. Findings of this study can be utilized to plan further prospective studies on this topic.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.