Back

Potential diagnostic biomarkers for human mesenchymal tumors, especially LMP2/b1i and cyclin E1 differential expression

Tanabe, Y.; Hayashi, T.; OKada, M.; Aburatani, H.; Abiko, K.; Konishi, I.

2024-06-28 oncology
10.1101/2024.06.27.24309614
Show abstract

ObjectivesMost mesenchymal tumors found in the uterine corpus are benign tumors; however, uterine leiomyosarcoma is a malignant tumor with unknown risk factors that repeatedly recurs and metastasizes. In some cases, the histopathologic findings of uterine leiomyoma and uterine leiomyosarcoma are similar and surgical pathological diagnosis using excised tissue samples is difficult. It is necessary to analyze the risk factors for human uterine leiomyosarcoma and establish diagnostic biomarkers and treatments. Female mice deficient in the proteasome subunit low molecular mass peptide 2 (LMP2)/{beta}1i develop uterine leiomyosarcoma spontaneously. MethodologyOut of 334 patients with suspected uterine mesenchymal tumors, patients diagnosed with smooth muscle tumors of the uterus were selected from the pathological file. To investigate the expression status of biomarker candidate factors, immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies of biomarker candidate factors on thin-cut slides of human uterine leiomyosarcoma, uterine leiomyoma, and other uterine mesenchymal tumors. ResultsIn human uterine leiomyosarcoma, there was a loss of LMP2/{beta}1i expression and enhanced cyclin E1 and Ki-67 expression. In human uterine leiomyomas and normal uterine smooth muscle layers, enhanced LMP2/{beta}1i expression and the disappearance of the expression of E1 and Ki-67 were noted. The pattern of expression of each factor in other uterine mesenchymal tumors was different from that of uterine leiomyosarcoma. ConclusionsLMP2/{beta}1i, cyclin E1, and Ki-67 may be candidate factors for biomarkers of human uterine leiomyosarcoma. Further large-cohort clinical trials should be conducted to establish treatments and diagnostics for uterine mesenchymal tumors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 0.2%
13.5%
2
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 1%
12.9%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 49%
10.4%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 35%
5.1%
5
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 0.9%
4.6%
6
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 0.4%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
10
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
11
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
14
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
20
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 29%
0.8%
26
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
28
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 53%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 18%
0.7%