Back

Metabolic reprogramming induced by periodic dietary restriction of animal products has beneficial effects on human health

Rouskas, K.; Bocher, O.; Mantas, P.; Skoulakis, A.; Simistiras, A.; Emmanouil, C.; Park, Y.-C.; Dimopoulos, A.; Glentis, S.; Kastenmuller, G.; Zeggini, E.; Dimas, A.

2024-04-19 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.04.19.24306061 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesDietary interventions can be a powerful tool for the prevention and treatment of diseases, but the molecular mechanisms through which diet affects health remain underexplored in humans. Generating robust evidence on the molecular impact of specific dietary patterns in humans will help us harness the power of dietary interventions to improve health. MethodsHere, we compare plasma metabolomic and proteomic profiles between dietary states for a unique group of individuals (N=200) who alternate between omnivory and restriction of animal products for religious reasons. We also contrast findings to a control group of continuously omnivorous individuals (N=211). ResultsWe find that short-term animal product restriction drives reductions in levels of lipid classes and of branched-chain amino acids, not detected in the control group, and results in metabolic profiles associated with decreased risk for all-cause mortality. We show that 23% of restriction-associated proteins are druggable targets and reveal that pro-longevity hormone FGF21 and seven additional proteins (FOLR2, SUMF2, HAVCR1, PLA2G1B, OXT, HPGDS, SPP1) display the greatest magnitude of change upon restriction. Through Mendelian randomization we demonstrate potentially causal effects of FGF21 and HAVCR1 on risk for type 2 diabetes, of HPGDS on BMI, and of OXT on risk for lacunar stroke. ConclusionsWe demonstrate that short-term restriction of animal products results in metabolic reprogramming with mostly positive effects on health and emphasise high-value targets for pharmacological intervention.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.