Back

Protocol for semantic segmentation of spinal endoscopic instruments and anatomic structures : how far is robotic endoscopy surgery?

Fan, G.; Yue, G.; Hu, Z.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Liao, X.

2024-04-15 pain medicine
10.1101/2024.04.14.24305785 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAutomatic analysis of endoscopic images will played an important role in the future spine robotic surgery. The study is designed as a translational study to develop AI models of semantic segmentation for spinal endoscopic instruments and anatomic structures. The aim is to provide the visual understanding basis of endoscopic images for future intelligent robotic surgery. MethodsAn estimate of 500 cases of endoscopic video will be included in the study. More data may also be included from the internet for external validation. Video clip containing typical spinal endoscopic instruments and distinct anatomic structures will be extracted. Typical spinal endoscopic instruments will include forceps, bipolar electrocoagulation, drill and so on. Endoscopic anatomic structures will include ligament, upper lamina, lower lamina, nerve root, disc, adipofascia, etc. The ratio of training, validation and testing set of included samples is initially set as 8: 1: 1. State-of-art algorithm (namely UNet, Swin-UNet, DeepLab-V3, etc) and self-developed deep learning algorithm will be used to develop the semantic segmentation models. Dice coefficient (DC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean surface distance (MSD) will be used to assess the segmentation performance. DiscussionsThis protocol firstly proposed the research plans to develop deep learning models to achieve multi-task semantic segmentation of spinal endoscopy images. Automatically recognizing and simultaneously contouring the surgical instruments and anatomic structures will teach the robot understand the surgical procedures of human surgeons. The research results and the annotated data will be disclosed and published in the near future. MetadataThe authors did not receive any funding for this work yet. The authors have declared no competing interests. No data analyzed during the current study. All pertinent data from this study will be disclosed upon study completion.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.