Back

Genetic risk score for coronary artery calcification predicts coronary artery disease beyond traditional risk factors

Mishra, P. P.; Hamal Mishra, B.; Lyytikainen, L.-P.; Goebeler, S.; Martiskainen, M.; Hakamaa, E.; Kleber, M.; Delgado, G. E.; Maerz, W.; Kahonen, M.; Karhunen, P.; Lehtimaki, T.

2024-03-29 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.03.27.24304983 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimThe modest added predictive value of the existing genetic risk scores (GRSs) for coronary artery disease (CAD) could be partly due to missing genetic components, hidden in the genetic architecture of intermediate phenotypes such as coronary artery calcification (CAC). In this study, we investigated the predictive ability of CAC GRS for CAD. Materials and methodsWe investigated the association of CAC GRSs with CAD and coronary calcification among the participants in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study (LURIC) (n=2742), the Tampere Vascular Study (TVS) (n=133), and the Tampere Sudden Death Study (TSDS) (n=660) using summary data from the largest multi-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis of CAC to date. Added predictive value of the CAC GRS over the traditional CVD risk factors was tested with standard train-test machine learning approach using the LURIC data, which had the largest sample size. ResultsCAC GRS was significantly associated with CAD in LURIC (OR=1.41, 95% CI [1.28-1.55]), TVS (OR=1.79, 95% CI [1.05-3.21]) as well as in TSDS (OR=4.20, 95% CI [1.74-10.52]). CAC GRS showed strong association with calcification areas in left (OR=1.78, 95% CI [1.16-2.74]) and right (OR=1.71, 95% CI [1.98-2.67]) coronary arteries. In addition, there was statistically significant added predictive value of the CAC GRS for CAD over the used traditional CVD risk factors (AUC 0.734 vs 0.717, p-value = 0.02). ConclusionsThis study showed that CAC GRS is a new risk marker for CAD in three European cohorts, with added predictive value over the traditional CVD risk factors.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.