Biometric analysis of induced stress and learning during the performance of pericardiocentesis in a virtual reality simulated scenario: a before and after study
Rubio-Lopez, A.; Garcia Carmona, R.; Zarandieta Roman, L.; Rubio Navas, A.; Gonzalez Pinto, A.; Cardinal-Fernandez, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe CoBaTrICE initiative standardized intensive care training throughout Europe. Pericardiocentesis, an important yet infrequent operation, poses unique training challenges often unmet by conventional methods. This study evaluates the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) simulations and 3D-printed mannequins in this procedure training, both crafted from scratch using highly affordable materials and free software. MethodsThirty-five final-year medical students participated in this prospective, quasi-experimental study. Initially, students underwent VR simulation training, followed by training using 3D-printed self-made mannequins. Learning outcomes were assessed using the Objective and Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) questionnaire. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was employed to monitor stress responses, while the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used to gauge self-perceived difficulty. ResultsAlthough the mannequin model induced more stress reactions, it excelled in tasks requiring fine motor skills, such as correct placement and asepsis maintenance. In contrast, lower NASA-TLX scores indicated that the VR model imposed less mental demand and effort, reflecting a reduced cognitive load. ConclusionBoth VR simulations and 3D-printed mannequins effectively taught pericardiocentesis skills, each offering distinct advantages. Mannequins enhanced fine motor skills, whereas VR reduced cognitive load and increased engagement. The combination of both approaches could maximize training outcomes, particularly in resource-constrained environments, thus broadening access to advanced simulation education.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 95%
- Student self-assessment: feasibility, advantages and limitations Example of a workshop for trainee surgeons using a suture score 95%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 93%
- Remote patient monitoring and digital therapeutics in heart failure: lessons from the Continuum pilot study 92%
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- REPLICCAR II Study: Data Quality Audit in the Paulista Cardiovascular Surgery Registry 94%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 93%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 92%
- Impact of Losartan on Portal hypertension and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 94%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 93%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.