Back

High-fat and high-carbohydrate diets worsen the mouse brain susceptibility to damage produced by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Shiga toxin 2

Arenas-Mosquera, D.; Cerny, N.; Cangelosi, A.; Geoghegan, P. A.; Malchiodi, E. L.; De Marzi, M.; Pinto, A.; Goldstein, J.

2024-02-06 microbiology
10.1101/2024.02.06.579171 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNutrition quality could be one of the reasons why, in the face of a Shiga toxin-producing enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli outbreak, some patients experience more profound deleterious effects than others, including unfortunate deaths. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether high-fat and/or high-carbohydrate diets could negatively modulate the deleterious action of Shiga toxin 2 on ventral anterior and ventral lateral thalamic nuclei and the internal capsule, the neurological centers responsible for motor activity. MethodsMice were fed a regular, high-fat, high-carbohydrate diet or a combination of both previous to the intravenous administration of Shiga toxin 2 or vehicle. Four days after intravenous administration, mice were subjected to behavioral tests and then sacrificed for histological and immunofluorescence assays to determine alterations in the neurovascular unit at the cellular and functional levels. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. The criterion for significance was p = 0.0001 for all experiments. ResultsThe high-fat and the high-carbohydrate diets significantly heightened the deleterious effect of Stx2, while the combination of both diets yielded the worst results, including endothelial glycocalyx and oligodendrocyte alterations, astrocyte and microglial reactivity, neurodegeneration, and motor and sensitivity impairment. ConclusionsIn view of the results presented here, poor nutrition could negatively influence patients affected by Stx2 at a neurological level. Systemic effects, however, cannot be ruled out.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.