Do People Reduce Attempts At Lifestyle Change After Initiating Weight Loss Medication? A Review Of Trial Evidence.
MacFarlane, M.; Cooper, D.; Avenell, A.
Show abstract
Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are used with lifestyle change support for weight management for adults with obesity. We investigated whether initiation of AOMs appeared to reduce attempted lifestyle changes. We searched for orlistat, liraglutide, semaglutide, and low-fat reducing diet (LFRD) trials in a trial register, Medline, Embase and systematic reviews from 1990 to June 2023. Weight changes in placebo groups of AOM trials with lifestyle interventions were compared to weight changes in LFRD trials. 16 orlistat, 7 liraglutide, 5 semaglutide, and 7 LFRD trials were included. Weight loss in orlistat placebo groups was 1.1kg less than LFRDs, a statistically non-significant difference, where last observation carried forward values were used for missing data in trials. Adjustment with baseline observation carried forward found 2.6kg less weight lost, a significant difference. Last observation carried forward data for orlistat trials providing completer data found a 0.2kg difference. Liraglutide placebo groups had 2.1kg less weight lost than predicted from LFRD trials. Semaglutide placebo groups had 2.0kg less weight loss. Compensatory reductions in changes to lifestyle behaviours may result following AOM initiation, but this needs to be explored further. Variability in trial design and study populations may contribute to the differences in weight change found.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of use and interest in using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss: a population study in Great Britain 93%
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials 91%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transforming Obesity Prevention for CHILDren (TOPCHILD) Collaboration: protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis of behavioural interventions for the prevention of early childhood obesity 96%
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 95%
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of phentermine/topiramate in adults with overweight or obesity: A meta-analysis and systematic review 96%
- The Pediatric Obesity Microbiome and Metabolism Study (POMMS): Methods, Baseline Data, and Early Insights. 89%
- National, state, and county estimates of adult overweight and obesity from electronic health records and kiosks in retail locations, 2024-2025 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 92%
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 90%
- Direct Economic Burden of Mental Health Disorders Associated with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists modestly reduced blood pressure among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and meta-regression 93%
- Comparative Effects of Weight Loss and Incretin-Based Therapies on Endothelial Vasodilatory and Fibrinolytic Function 92%
- A Microbiome-targeting Fiber-enriched Nutritional Formula is Well Tolerated and Improves Quality of Life and Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.