AI-powered Coronary Artery Calcium Scans (AI-CAC) Enables Prediction of Heart Failure and Outperforms NT-proBNP: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Naghavi, M.; Reeves, A. P.; Budoff, M. J.; Li, D.; Atlas, K.; Zhang, C.; Atlas, T.; Henschke, C.; Defilippi, C.; Levy, D.; Yankelevitz, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionCoronary artery calcium (CAC) scans contain useful information beyond the Agatston CAC score that is not currently reported. We recently reported that artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled cardiac chambers volumetry in CAC scans (AI-CAC) predicted incident atrial fibrillation in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). In this study, we investigated the performance of AI-CAC for prediction of incident heart failure (HF) and compared it with 10 known clinical risk factors, NT-proBNP, and the Agatston CAC score. MethodsWe applied AI-CAC to 5750 CAC scans of asymptomatic individuals (ages 45-84, 52% women, White 40%, Black 26%, Hispanic 22% Chinese 12%) free of known cardiovascular disease at the MESA baseline examination (2000-2002). We then used the 15-year outcomes data and compared the C-statistic of AI-CAC with NT-proBNP and the Agatston score for predicting incident HF versus 10 known clinical risk factors (age, gender, body surface area, diabetes, current smoking, hypertension medication, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL, HDL, total cholesterol, and hs-CRP). ResultsOver 15 years of follow-up, 256 HF events accrued. The ROC area under the curve for predicting HF with AI-CAC (0.826) was significantly higher than NT-proBNP (0.742) and Agatston score (0.712) (p<.0001), and comparable to clinical risk factors (0.818, p=0.4141). AI-CAC category-free NRI significantly improved on clinical risk factors (0.43), NT-proBNP (0.68), and Agatston score (0.71) for HF prediction at 15 years (p<0.0001). ConclusionAI-CAC significantly outperformed NT-proBNP and the Agatston CAC score and significantly improved category-free NRI of clinical risk factors for incident HF prediction.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolomic profile for understanding heart failure classifications 96%
- Left ventricular mass and global wall thickness – prognostic utility and characterization of left ventricular hypertrophy 96%
- Improved evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy using the spatial QRS-T angle by electrocardiography 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 96%
- The HeartMagic prospective observational study protocol - characterizing subtypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 95%
- Carotid Intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and incident heart failure in older men: The British Regional Heart Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 95%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 95%
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 96%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 96%
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 97%
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 97%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.