The effect of problem-based learning on improving problem-solving, self-directed learning, and critical thinking ability for the pharmacy students
Zhao, Y.-J.; Huang, F.-Q.; Liu, Q.; Li, Y.; Alolga, R. N.; Zhang, L.; Ma, G.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effect of PBL on problem-solving, self-directed learning, and critical thinking ability of pharmaceutical students through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and meta-analysis of RCTs. MethodsIn 2021, 57 third-year pharmacy students from China Pharmaceutical University were randomly divided into a PBL group and a lecture-based learning (LBL) group. Mean scores were compared between the two groups for problem-solving, self-directed learning, communication skills, critical thinking, and final exam grades. Students feedback on the implementation of PBL was also collected. A meta-analysis was subsequently performed on eight studies involving 1,819 students. ResultsThe PBL group had significantly higher mean scores for problem-solving (8.43{+/-}1.56) and self-directed learning (7.39{+/-}1.19) than the LBL group (7.02{+/-}1.72 and 6.41{+/-}1.28, respectively). The PBL group also showed better communication skills (8.86{+/-}1.47) than the LBL group (7.68{+/-}1.89). The mean level of critical thinking was significantly higher in the PBL group than the LBL group (p=0.02). The PBL group also had better final exam grades (79.86{+/-}1.38) compared to the LBL group (68.1{+/-}1.76). Student feedback on PBL implementation was positive. The subsequent meta-analysis confirmed these findings. ConclusionThis study found that PBL is an effective teaching method for pharmacy students.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs: a qualitative content analysis 95%
- Effectiveness of Online Training in Improving Primary Care Doctors Competency in Brief Tobacco Interventions: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of WHO Modules in Delta State, Nigeria 93%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 93%
- Comparing Traditional and Online Problem-Based Learning in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Nagoya: A Novel Statistical Approach in Japanese Educational Settings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biofilms with a dash of color: A hands-on activity for school students to build a biofilm model, and use it to understand antibiotic tolerance in biofilms 92%
- Preprint peer review enhances undergraduate biology students' disciplinary literacy and sense of belonging in STEM 91%
- Flying in the Face of Adversity: A Drosophila-based Virtual CURE Provides Semester-long Authentic Research Opportunity to the Flipped Classroom. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 91%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 90%
- Data-driven methodology for discovery and response to pulmonary symptomology in hypertension through AI and machine learning: Application to COVID-19 related pharmacovigilance 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 93%
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 92%
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.