Back

Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude towards Blood Donation among Blood Donors in Jordan

Omaish, R.; Al-Fayyadh, Z.; Al-Habashneh, S.; Al-Mashhdi, S.; Khasawneh,, S.; Naber, I.; Bourghli, S.; Al-Adily, T.; Mahafzah, A.; Al-Fararjeh, F.; Sughayer, M. a.

2023-09-25 hematology
10.1101/2023.09.22.23295898 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThis study will identify blood donor characteristics in Jordan. The study aims to investigate the extent of awareness and knowledge regarding blood donation among blood donors and to explore their attitudes towards blood donation in general. It also highlights various motivational factors and obstacles which impact the decision to donate blood among Jordanian donors. BackgroundRecruitment of low risk blood donors can be challenging. Efforts should be made to increase the level of awareness and positive attitude toward blood donation. An essential step to achieve this is obtaining comprehensive data about the current situation of awareness, knowledge, and attitudes of the population towards blood donation. Methods/MaterialsThe present study was conducted at two blood donation centers in Amman, Jordan, during 2021. A total of 535 whole blood donors were included. Data regarding their demographic characteristics, blood donation history as well as their knowledge and attitudes regarding blood donation was collected by a questionnaire. ResultsFour hundred ninety participants (91.6%) were males while 45 only (8.4%) were females. One hundred forty subjects (19.4%) were first time donors while 431 subjects (80.6%) had previous donations. The participants median score in the knowledge section was 19.0 points (range 5-25 points). There was no significant correlation between participants overall attitude score and their corresponding demographic characteristics or their overall knowledge score. ConclusionMeasures to improve knowledge and attitude toward blood donation should be implemented in order to meet the increasing demand for blood and blood components. Targeted campaigns, correction of some misconceptions, and using different motivations are suggested.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
29.5%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
21
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
28
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%