Back

Different indicators of stress-induced hyperglycemia and poor outcomes after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

Song, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Wang, A.; Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Wang, C.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Q.

2023-06-22 neurology
10.1101/2023.06.19.23291632 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the predictive value of metrics unique to stress-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) with fasting blood on poor functional outcomes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). MethodsThis investigation included 528 patients from a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study. Poor functional outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale(mRS) [&ge;] 3. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between indicators of SIH, including fasting blood glucose (FBG), two definitions of the stress hyperglycemia ratio [SHR, the fast blood glucose concentration/estimated average glucose (SHR1) and the ratio of glucose to HbA1c(SHR2)], and glycemic gap (GG), and poor functional outcomes at 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year. ResultsHigher values of all these indicators for SIH (e.g., FBG, GG, SHR1, and SHR2) were independently related to poor outcomes at 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year in patients with sICH (p < 0.05 for all models). Compared with the area under the curve (AUC), all these indicators performed greater AUC in predicting poor prognosis at 1-year (FBG: AUC=0.710; GG: AUC=0.741; SHR1: AUC=0.743) than 30-day and 90-day. And SHR2 has the highest predictive value among these indicators (AUC=0.748). Finally, diabetes had no statistical effect on the correlation between these indicators and poor functional outcomes at 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year in subgroup analysis (p for interaction >0.05). ConclusionsPatients with higher FBG, GG, SHR1, and SHR2 values were more likely to have a poor functional outcome. SHR2 has the highest predictive value for poor outcomes at 30-day, 90-day and 1-year.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.