Effectiveness of drugs for COVID-19 inpatients in Japanese medical claim data as average treatment effects with inverse probability weighted regression adjustment
Mitsushima, S.; Horiguchi, H.; Taniguchi, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrior studies have indicated that drugs against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) such as antiviral drugs, anti-inflammatory drugs, steroid and antibody cocktails are expected to prevent severe COVID-19outcomes and death. ObjectWe analyzed medical claim data in Japan to assess the effectiveness of drugs againstCOVID-19. MethodWe applied an average treatment effect model with inverse probability weighted regression adjustment, to the Medical Information Analysis Databank managed by National Hospital Organization in Japan. The outcome was death during hospitalization. Subjects were all inpatients, inpatients with oxygen therapy, and inpatients with respiratory ventilators, by three age classes: all ages, 65 years old or older, and younger than 65 years old. Data on physical characteristics, underlying diseases, administered drugs, the proportion of mutated strains, and vaccine coverage were used as explanatory variables for logistic regression. ResultEstimated results indicated that only an antibody cocktails (sotrovimab, casirivimab and imdevimab) raised the probability of saving life, even though these drugs were administered in few cases. On the other hand, other drugs might raise the probability of death. DiscussionResults indicated that only antibody cocktails was effective to save life using an average treatment effect model with inverse probability weighted regression adjustment. No other drugs such as remdesivir, dexamethasone, baricitinib and tocilizumab were found to be effective to save life, even in the pseudo-situation of random assignment.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: a population-based cohort study from Italy 95%
- Treatment Profiles And Clinical Outcomes Of COVID-19 Patients At Private Hospital In Jakarta 94%
- Medium-term impacts of the waves of the COVID-19 epidemic on treatments for non-COVID-19 patients in intensive care units: a retrospective cohort study in Japan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The efficacy of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. ex Nees crude extract in hospitalised mild COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Japan: A large observational study using the COVID-19 Registry Japan 96%
- Impact of Antibody Cocktail Therapy Combined with Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Clinical Outcome for Covid-19 patients in A Real-Life Setting: A Single Institute Analysis 95%
- Effectiveness of inactive COVID-19 vaccines against severe illness in B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant-infected patients in Jiangsu, China 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in reducing the risk of severe outcome in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a real-life full-matched case-control study (SAVALO Study) 93%
- Explanation of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Cases in Japan Using Google Trends Before and During the COVID-19: Infodemiology Study 93%
- Ruxolitinib versus Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19: multicenter matched-controlled study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.