Back

Cocoa flavanols improve peakVO2 and exercise capacity in a randomized double blinded clinical trial in healthy elderly

Groene, M.; Duse, D. A.; Kramser, N.; Ophoff, N.; Schweers, H.; Voss, F.; Quast, C.; Sansone, R.; Heiss, C.; Jung, C.; Kelm, M.; Erkens, R.

2023-04-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.04.25.23289076
Show abstract

BackgroundLoss of functional capacity is one of the hallmarks in cardiovascular aging. Cocoa flavanols (CF) exert favorable effects on endothelial function, blood pressure, and inflammation. These cardiovascular health markers worsen with increasing age and limit functional exercise capacity. AimTo investigate the effect of CF on cardiorespiratory-fitness in healthy elderly. MethodsIn a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group dietary intervention trial, 68 healthy elderly (55-79 years, 28 female) received either 500 mg of CF or a nutrient-matched control capsule twice a day for 30 days. Primary endpoint was defined as peak oxygen consumption (VO2) in a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Secondary endpoints were oxygen pulse (VO2/heart rate (HR)), resting blood pressure (BP), and resting vascular function. ResultsAfter 30 days of CF intake peakVO2 increased by 190 ml/min (95% CI 1-371 ml/min) and peakVO2/kg by 2.5 ml/(min*kg) (95% CI 0.30-4.2 ml/(min*kg)). O2-pulse increased by 1.7 ml (95% CI 0.29-3.2 ml) and max exercise capacity by 9.6 W (95% CI 2.1-17.7 W). CF decreased resting systolic and diastolic BP by 5.4 mmHg (95% CI -10.7 - -0.1 mmHg) and 2.9 mmHg (95% CI (-) 5.5-(-) 0.4 mmHg), respectively. Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) increased by an absolute 1.3% (95% CI 0.76-1.79 %) in the CF group. Indexes of pulmonary function were not affected. No changes for primary and secondary endpoints were detected in control. ConclusionCF substantially improve markers of cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy elderly humans highlighting their potential to preserve cardiovascular health with increasing age.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 2%
11.3%
2
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 0.3%
7.6%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 1%
7.6%
4
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 0.6%
5.3%
6
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
4.5%
7
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 1%
4.5%
8
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Current Developments in Nutrition
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
2.5%
11
Clinical Epigenetics
based on 21 papers
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 64%
2.3%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.3%
14
Circulation: Heart Failure
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
GeroScience
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 92%
1.3%
17
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 45%
1.3%
18
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
based on 12 papers
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 13%
1.2%
21
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
23
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 41%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Nutrition
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 4%
0.7%