Back

Role of non-classical monocytes in HIV-associated vascular cognitive impairment

Singh, M. V.; Uddin, N.; Covacevich Vidalle, M.; Sutton, K. R.; Boodoo, Z. D.; Peterson, A.; Tyrell, A.; Brenner, R.; Tivarus, M. E.; Wang, H. Z.; Sahin, B.; Zhong, J.; Weber, M.; Wang, L.; Qiu, X.; Maggirwar, S. B.; Schifitto, G.

2023-03-27 hiv aids
10.1101/2023.03.24.23287660 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite antiretroviral treatment (cART), people living with HIV (PLWH) are more susceptible to neurocognitive impairment (NCI), probably due to synergistic/additive contribution of traditional cerebrovascular risk factors. Specifically, altered blood brain barrier (BBB) and transmigration of inflammatory monocytes are risk factors for developing cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). In order to investigate if inflammatory monocytes exacerbate CSVD and cognitive impairment, 110 PLWH on cART and 110 age-, sex- and Reynolds cardiovascular risk score-matched uninfected individuals were enrolled. Neuropsychological testing, brain magnetic resonance imaging and whole blood analyses to measure platelet-monocyte interaction and monocyte, endothelial activation were performed. Results demonstrated that PLWH exhibited increased levels of platelet-monocyte complexes (PMCs) and higher expression of activation molecules on PMCs. PLWH with CSVD had the poorest cognitive performance and the highest circulating levels of non-classical monocytes which exhibited significant inverse correlation with each other. Furthermore, markers of monocyte and endothelium activation were significantly positively correlated indicating BBB impairment. Our results confirm that interaction with platelets activates and drives monocytes towards an inflammatory phenotype in PLWH. In particular, elevated levels of non-classical monocytes may represent a common pathway to neuroinflammation, CSVD and subsequent cognitive impairment, warranting further longitudinal studies to evaluate responsiveness of this potential biomarker.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.