Expanding Interdisciplinarity: A bibliometric study of medical education using the MEJ-24
Maggio, L.; Costello, J. A.; Ninkov, A.; Frank, J.; Artino, A. R.
Show abstract
IntroductionInterdisciplinary research has been deemed to be critical in solving societys wicked problems, including those relevant to medical education. Medical education research has been assumed to be interdisciplinary. However, researchers have questioned this assumption. The present study, a conceptual replication, provides an analysis using a larger dataset and bibliometric methods to bring more clarity to our understanding on the nature of medical education interdisciplinarity or lack thereof. MethodThe authors retrieved the cited references of all published articles in 24 medical education journals between 2001-2020 from the Web of Science (WoS). We then identified the WoS classifications for the journals of each cited reference. ResultsThe 24 journals published 31,283 articles referencing 723,683 publications. We identified 493,973 (68.3%) of those cited references in 6,618 journals representing 242 categories, which represents 94% of all WoS categories. Close to half of all citations were categorized as "education, scientific disciplines" and "healthcare sciences and services". Over the two decades studied, we observed consistent growth in the number of references in other categories, such as education, educational research, and nursing. Additionally, the variety of categories represented has also increased from 182 to 233 to include a diversity of topics such as business, management, and linguistics. DiscussionThis study corroborates prior work while also expanding it. Medical education research is built upon a limited range of fields referenced. Yet, the growth in categories over time and the ongoing increased diversity of included categories suggests interdisciplinarity that until now has yet to be recognized and represents a changing story.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 97%
- Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications 95%
- Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers' confidential comments to editors 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project 95%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 94%
- Global research on syndemics: A meta-knowledge analysis (2001-2020) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre-post study. 95%
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries 91%
- A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupational safety and health aspects of corporate social responsibility reporting in Japan: comparison between 2012 and 2020 89%
- Identification and Attribution of Weekly Periodic Biases in Epidemiological Time Series Data 88%
- The Aliment to Bodily Condition knowledgebase (ABCkb): A database connecting plants and human health 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.