Comprehensive analysis of primary immune thrombocytopenia clinical trials in the ClinicalTrials.gov database
Wang, Y.; Bi, H.; Yang, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Xie, D.; Li, H.; Zhou, Z.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe purpose is to clarify the overall situation of clinical related to primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), to evaluate the difference between published clinical trials and unpublished trials, and to evaluate the relevant information of trial publication. MethodsSearch the ClinicalTrials.gov database on March 20, 2022 to identify ITP clinical trials and obtain relevant data. Publications in PubMed were searched using standardized methods to identify the publication of completed clinical trials. ResultsOf 341 trials identified, interventional trials were the most common (74.2%, n=253). Interventional trials and observational trials differ in the main research content (odds ratio (OR) 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.015, P=0.000). In terms of published articles, there are few trials involving non drugs (OR 0.23, CI 0.08-0.64, P = 0.005). There were fewer trials with less than 10 participants (OR 1.52, CI 1.06-2.20, P = 0.024). Of the 167 completed trials, 93 (55.7%) were published and 48 (28.7%) uploaded results. ConclusionIf the main research content involves drugs, trials with a larger number of people are more likely to be published. The publication rate of ITP clinical trials is high, but the submission rate of database results is low. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the submission of clinical trial results in the later stage.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19: a protocol for a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (the SCORPIO-SR trial) 93%
- Combination therapy of Tocilizumab and steroid for management of COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience from Pune, Western India 92%
- The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Liver Injury in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
- First-Line Systemic Treatment Strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma : a cost-effectiveness analysis 94%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- A retrospective study evaluating efficacy and safety of compassionate use of tocilizumab in 13 patients with severe-to-critically ill COVID-19: analysis of well-responding cases and rapidly-worsening cases after tocilizumab administration 93%
- Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial to study co-administration of Ashwagandha on safety, immunogenicity, and protection with COVID-19 vaccine – A Study Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Antibody Cocktail Therapy Combined with Casirivimab and Imdevimab on Clinical Outcome for Covid-19 patients in A Real-Life Setting: A Single Institute Analysis 93%
- Efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Japan: A large observational study using the COVID-19 Registry Japan 92%
- Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Lactococcus lactis strain plasma (LC-Plasma) in easing symptoms in patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): protocol for an exploratory, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (PLATEAU study) 95%
- Efficacy of clarithromycin on COVID-19 pneumonia without oxygen administration; protocol for multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled, 3-armed parallel group comparison, exploratory trial (CAME COVID study) 94%
- Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.