Back

The SENSOR System: Using Standardized Data Entry and Dashboards for Review of Scientific Studies on the Utility of Blood-Based Protein Biomarkers for Patients with Mild Brain Injury

Aggerwal, S.; Safi, T.; Beliveau, P.; Gupta, G.

2023-01-12 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2023.01.10.23284296 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is no objective way of diagnosing or prognosticating acute traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). A systematic review conducted by Mondello et al. reviewed studies looking at blood based protein biomarkers in the context of acute mild traumatic brain injuries and correlation to results of computed tomography scanning. This paper provides a summary of this same literature using the SENSOR system. MethodsAn existing review written by Mondello et al. was selected to apply the previously described SENSOR system (Kamal et al.) that uses a systematic process made up of a Google Form for data intake, Google Drive for article access, and Google Sheets for the creation of the dashboard. The dashboard consisted of a map, bubble graphs, multiple score charts, and a pivot table to facilitate the presentation of data. ResultsA total of 29 entries were inputted by two team members. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), demographics, cut-off levels, biomarker levels, and assay ranges were analyzed and presented in this study. S100B and GFAP biomarkers may provide good clinical utility, whereas UCH-L1, C-Tau, and NSE do not. DiscussionThis study determined the feasibility and reliability of multiple biomarkers (S100B, UCH-L1, GFAP, C-tau, and NSE) in predicting traumatic brain lesions on CT scans, in mTBI patients, using the SENSOR system. Many potential limitations exist for the existing literature including controlling for known confounders for mild traumatic brain injuries. ConclusionThe SENSOR system is an adaptable, dynamic, and graphical display of scientific studies that has many benefits, which may still require further validation. Certain protein biomarkers may be helpful in deciding which patients with mTBIs require CT scans, but impact on prognosis is still not clear based on the available literature.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
3
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
5
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
19
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%