The SENSOR System: Using Standardized Data Entry and Dashboards for Review of Scientific Studies on the Utility of Blood-Based Protein Biomarkers for Patients with Mild Brain Injury
Aggerwal, S.; Safi, T.; Beliveau, P.; Gupta, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is no objective way of diagnosing or prognosticating acute traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). A systematic review conducted by Mondello et al. reviewed studies looking at blood based protein biomarkers in the context of acute mild traumatic brain injuries and correlation to results of computed tomography scanning. This paper provides a summary of this same literature using the SENSOR system. MethodsAn existing review written by Mondello et al. was selected to apply the previously described SENSOR system (Kamal et al.) that uses a systematic process made up of a Google Form for data intake, Google Drive for article access, and Google Sheets for the creation of the dashboard. The dashboard consisted of a map, bubble graphs, multiple score charts, and a pivot table to facilitate the presentation of data. ResultsA total of 29 entries were inputted by two team members. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), demographics, cut-off levels, biomarker levels, and assay ranges were analyzed and presented in this study. S100B and GFAP biomarkers may provide good clinical utility, whereas UCH-L1, C-Tau, and NSE do not. DiscussionThis study determined the feasibility and reliability of multiple biomarkers (S100B, UCH-L1, GFAP, C-tau, and NSE) in predicting traumatic brain lesions on CT scans, in mTBI patients, using the SENSOR system. Many potential limitations exist for the existing literature including controlling for known confounders for mild traumatic brain injuries. ConclusionThe SENSOR system is an adaptable, dynamic, and graphical display of scientific studies that has many benefits, which may still require further validation. Certain protein biomarkers may be helpful in deciding which patients with mTBIs require CT scans, but impact on prognosis is still not clear based on the available literature.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 94%
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 93%
- Upregulation of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 in traumatic brain injury patients and their potential as biomarkers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of xenon and argon inhalation on erythropoiesis and steroidogenesis: a systematic review 91%
- Reliability of force plate-based measures of standing balance in the sub-acute stage of post-stroke recovery 89%
- Linear vector models of time perception account for saccade and stimulus novelty interactions 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atypical Resting State Functional Connectivity in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury 90%
- Assessment of Post SARS CoV 2 Fatigue among Physicians Working in COVID Designated Hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh 89%
- Mental health status of the general population, healthcare professionals, and university students during 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak in Jordan: a cross-sectional study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 91%
- Effectiveness of Focal Muscle Vibrations in Improving Sensorimotor Performance, Mobility and Strength in Spinal Cord Injury Population: A Systematic Review 91%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.