SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG serology and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients
S, M.; Kumar, P.; Panda, P. K.; Jain, V.; Raina, R.; Saha, S.; S, V.; Omar, B. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 virus has become pandemic for the last 2 years. Inflammatory response to the virus leads to organ dysfunction and death. Predicting the severity of inflammatory response helps in managing critical patients using serology tests IgG and IgM. We conducted a longitudinal study to correlate serum SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG serology with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. MethodsWe analyzed patient data from March to December of 2020 for those who were admitted at AIIMS Rishikesh. Clinical and laboratory data of these patients were collected from the e-hospital portal and analysed. Correlation was seen with clinical outcomes and was assessed using MS Excel 2010 and SPSS software. ResultsOut of 494 patients, the mean age of patients was 48.95 {+/-} 16.40 years and there were more male patients in the study (66.0%). The patients were classified into 4 groups; mild-moderate 328 (67.1%), severe 131 (26.8%) and critical 30 (6.1%). The mean duration from symptom onset to serology testing was 19.87 {+/-} 30.53 days. In-hospital mortality was observed in 25.1% patients. The seropositivity rate (i.e., either IgG or IgM >10 AU) was 50%. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of IgM Levels (AU/mL) (W = 33428.000, p = <0.001) and IgG Levels (AU/mL) (W = 39256.500, p = <0.001), with the median IgM/ IgG Levels (AU/mL) being highest in the RT-PCR-Positive group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of IgM Levels and IgG levels with all other clinical outcomes (disease severity, septic shock, Intensive care admission, mechanical ventilation and mortality). ConclusionSerology (IgM and IgG) levels are high in RTPCR positive group compared to clinical COVID-19. However, serology cannot be useful for the prediction of disease outcomes except few situations. The study also highlights the importance of doing serology at a particular time as antibody titres vary with the duration of the disease.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and outcome profile of Hospitalized African COVID-19 patients: The Ethiopian Context 98%
- Laboratory Biomarkers of COVID-19 Disease Severity and Outcome: Findings from a Developing Country 98%
- COVID-19 Disease Severity and Determinants among Ethiopian Patients: A study of the Millennium COVID-19 Care Center 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 97%
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 97%
- Clearing the fog: Is Hydroxychloroquine effective in reducing Corona virus disease-2019 progression: A randomized controlled trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of serum trace elements, macro-minerals, antioxidants, malondialdehyde and immunoglobulins in seborrheic dermatitis patients: A case-control investigation 94%
- Screening of plasma IL-6 and IL-17 in Bangladeshi lung cancer patients 94%
- Influence of body mass index on SAPS3 prognostic performance in critically ill patients from Brazil 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relative expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in COVID-19 patients manifested disease severities 97%
- Risk factors for bacterial infections in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A case control study 96%
- Probable causes and risk factors for positive SARS-CoV-2 test in recovered patients: Evidence from Brunei Darussalam 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.