Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Efficacy and Safety of Antibodies Combination (casirivimab and imdevimab) versus standard antiviral therapy as antiviral agent against Corona virus 2 infection in hospitalized COVID-19 patients
Hassan, A. H.; Hegazy, S. K.; Radwan, S. T.
Show abstract
IntroductionCorona Virus-induced disease - 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulates research works to find a solution to this crisis from starting 2020 year up to now. With ending of the 2021 year, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, Casirivimab and imdevimab antibody combination is a type of new immunotherapy against COVID-19. Standard antiviral therapy against COVID-19 includes Remdesivir and Favipravir. Aim of StudyTo compare the efficacy and safety of antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), Remdesivir, and Favipravir in the COVID-19 patients Patients and Population265 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were used to represent the COVID-19 population and were assigned into three groups in a ratio of (1:2:2) respectively, Group (A) received REGN3048-3051(Antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), group (B) received remdesivir, and group (C) received favipravir. MethodsThe study design is a single-blind non-Randomized Controlled Trial (non-RCT). The drugs of the study are owned by Mansoura University Hospital (MUH) and prescribed by chest diseases lectures of the faculty of medicine-Mansoura University. The duration of the study is about 6 months after ethical approval. Results and discussionCasirivimab and imdevimab achieve less 28-day mortality rate, less mortality at hospital discharge, more negative swab cases, less need for O2 therapy and IMV, less duration of this need, less hospital and ICU stay, less case progression as presented by lower World Health Organization (WHO) scale and better multi-organ functions as presented by lower Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score than Remdesivir and Favipravir. ConclusionFrom all of these results, it is concluded that Group A (Casirivimab & imdevimab) has more favorable clinical outcomes than B (remdesivir) & C (favipravir) intervention groups. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05502081, 16/08/2022, Clinicaltrials.gov, retrospectively registered
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and outcome profile of Hospitalized African COVID-19 patients: The Ethiopian Context 97%
- Laboratory Biomarkers of COVID-19 Disease Severity and Outcome: Findings from a Developing Country 96%
- Treatment Profiles And Clinical Outcomes Of COVID-19 Patients At Private Hospital In Jakarta 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 97%
- Clearing the fog: Is Hydroxychloroquine effective in reducing Corona virus disease-2019 progression: A randomized controlled trial 97%
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and effect of bacterial co-infections on clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at a tertiary care centre of India 97%
- Experience from a COVID-19 screening centre of a tertiary care institution: A retrospective hospital-based study 95%
- Seven day continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic telemetric study with pocket electrocardiographic recording device for detecting hydroxychloroquin induced arrhythmias 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is the infection of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant associated with the outcomes of COVID-19 patients? 95%
- Clinico epidemiological profile of Omicron variant of SARS CoV2 in Rajasthan 94%
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological And Clinical Characteristics Of COVID-19 Patients In Kenya 94%
- Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases among Bangladeshi Adults: An Application of Generalized Linear Mixed Model on Multilevel Demographic and Health Survey Data 94%
- Antibody response in individuals affected with Sars-Cov-2 infection: temporal trends and qualitative and quantitative differences in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. A Cross Sectional Analysis. Ab-Covid Study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.