Back

The Vitality Project: A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Effects of Qigong and Exercise/Nutrition Training on Fatigue, Emotional Health, and Stress in Fatigued Female Cancer Survivors

Zimmerman, C. S.; Temereanca, S.; Daniels, D. S.; Penner, C. K.; Cannonier, T.; Jones, S. R.; Kerr, C. E.

2022-08-19 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.08.18.22278965
Show abstract

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and burdensome, often long term side effect of cancer and its treatment. Many non-pharmacological treatments have been investigated as possible CRF therapies, including exercise, nutrition, health/psycho-education, and mind-body therapies. However, studies directly comparing the efficacy of these treatments are lacking. To fill this gap, we conducted a parallel single blind randomized control trial with women with CRF to directly compare the effects of Qigong (a form of mind-body intervention) (n=11) to an intervention that combined strength and aerobic exercise, plant-based nutrition and health/psycho-education (n=13). This design was chosen to determine the comparative efficacy of two non-pharmacologic interventions, with different physical demand intensity, in reducing the primary outcome measure of self-reported fatigue (FACIT Additional Concerns subscale). Both interventions showed a mean fatigue improvement of more than double the pre-established minimal clinically important difference of three (Qigong: 7.068 +/- 10.30, Exercise/Nutrition: 8.846 +/- 12.001). Mixed effects ANOVA analysis of group x time interactions revealed a significant main effect of time, such that both groups significantly improved fatigue from pre- to post treatment (F(1,22)=11.898, p=.002, generalized eta squared effect size=.116) There was no significant difference between fatigue improvement between groups (independent samples t-test: p=.70), suggesting a potential equivalence or non-inferiority of interventions, which we could not definitively establish due to our small sample size. This study provides evidence from a small sample that Qigong improves fatigue similarly to standard exercise-nutrition. Qigong additionally significantly improved secondary measures of mood, emotion regulation, and stress, while exercise/nutrition significantly improved secondary measures of sleep/fatigue. These findings provide preliminary evidence for divergent mechanisms of fatigue improvement across interventions, with Qigong providing a gentler and lower-intensity alternative to exercise/nutrition. This clinical trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 5%
37.5%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 36%
5.1%
3
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
5.1%
4
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 27%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 6%
2.6%
6
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.1%
7
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
2.0%
8
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
9
The Journal of Pain
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.5%
10
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 32%
1.5%
11
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
based on 10 papers
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Journal of Sleep Research
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
16
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 14%
0.9%
18
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 26%
0.9%
19
Advanced Science
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
21
EClinicalMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
23
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Health Expectations
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 4%
0.5%