Back

SciCV, the Swiss National Science Foundation's new CV format

Strinzel, M.; Kaltenbrunner, W.; van der Weijden, I.; von Arx, M.; Hill, M.

2022-03-18 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2022.03.16.484596 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) tested a new CV format called SciCV to encourage fair, DORA-compliant assessment of grant applicants. It was developed in close collaboration with the academic evaluation community and international experts, introduced through detailed change management and finally tested in its utility by an independent research team of the Center for Science and Technology Studies Leiden (CWTS). MethodsWe present the development of the SciCV pilot and its evaluation by the CWTS research group. The analysis comprised both quantitative and qualitative methods, with (i) surveys and semi-structured interviews with applicants and reviewers, (ii) text analysis of the narrative elements of SciCV, and (iii) participant observation in ten evaluation panel meetings. ResultsNarrative elements and the inclusion of the academic age were rated as most useful new CV elements, while the inclusion of two metrics, the h-index and the relative citation ratio, were received more critically. The omission of a full publication list had similar numbers of supporters and opponents among applicants and reviewers. Less experienced and junior applicants and reviewers rated the new format generally more positively than more senior applicants and reviewers. The text analysis of narrative elements yielded no significant gender specific differences. The participant observation revealed that the new elements in SciCV broadened the information base used in the evaluation of applicants but did not fundamentally alter traditional, publication-centred evaluation practices. ConclusionSciCV was a relevant and successful initiative for the SNSF, which showed that the implementation of a new, well-structured CV format is not only feasible but also something that many stakeholders welcome.The extensive experience and results obtained during the change process formed the basis for the development of SciCV 2.0 at the SNSF. It also offers a basis and guidance for other funding organisations planning similar initiatives.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
44.0%
2
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
3
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
6
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
7
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
11
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%