Back

Second Climate Survey of Biomedical PhD Students in the Time of Covid

Ramadoss, D.; Horn, J. P.

2022-01-18 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2022.01.13.476194 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In July 2021, sixteen months into the Covid-19 pandemic, the institutional climate for PhD training in the School of Medicine was assessed for a second time. This survey of graduate students occurred 1 year after initial surveys of graduate students and training faculty in July 2020. The 2021 survey was completed by 99 PhD students in 11 PhD-granting programs. To allow comparisons between years, most of the 2021 questions were repeated with only minor edits. A few items were added to assess impacts of school-wide town hall meetings, a new PhD career club program, and enlarged mental health services. Several themes emerged. Students remain extremely concerned about the pandemics impact upon their training and long-term career prospects. They worry specifically about pandemic related reductions in research productivity and networking opportunities. Many students successfully adapted to laboratory research under pandemic restrictions but suffer from the continuing lack of social interaction even after in-person work hours increased. Symptoms of anxiety and/or depression persist amongst 46% of the students, as compared to 51% in 2020. Nearly 80% of students continue to report strong satisfaction with mentoring relationships with their dissertation advisors, but to lesser extents with programs (66%), departments or centers (71%), the School of Medicine (32%) and the University (49%). Students (26%) express interest in the Ombuds office that was announced in late 2021. Some students wrote that the medical school could do a better job in embracing diversity and inclusion and in mentor training, and many stated that town hall meetings do not serve them well. Coping mechanisms shared by some students demonstrate impressive resilience. These results present a mixed picture. While aspects of biomedical PhD training have begun to recover as the pandemic continues, long-term consequences of the disruption raise challenges that must be addressed by efforts to restore and improve the learning environment required for 21st century research education.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
3
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
4
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.8%
8
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
21
Glycobiology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%