Back

Estimating the genetically predicted effects of lifestyle risk factors, educational attainment and Alzheimer's disease liability on weight change during midlife

Power, G. M.; Tyrrell, J. M.; Gkatzionis, A.; Fang, S.; Heron, J.; Davey Smith, G.; Richardson, T. G.

2021-07-30 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.07.21.21260895 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMaintaining a healthy weight across adulthood reduces morbidity and mortality risk in later life. This study aimed to examine factors contributing to weight change over a one-year interval in midlife. While conventional epidemiological analyses have reported risk factors associated with weight change, biases such as confounding present challenges when inferring causality. MethodsConventional observational analyses were used in addition to a one-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to estimate the genetically predicted effects of four exposures (alcohol consumption, smoking intensity, educational attainment and Alzheimers disease liability) on weight change (mean age: 56.9 years) using data from 329 531 participants in the UK Biobank. ResultsOne-sample MR indicated strong evidence that Alzheimers disease liability increased the odds of weight loss whilst conventional analyses reported little evidence of this. In MR and conventional epidemiological analyses, higher educational attainment was associated with maintaining a steady weight. In addition, higher alcohol consumption was associated with weight gain in conventional analyses only. Finally, whilst conventional analyses showed that smoking heaviness was associated with weight gain, the converse was supported by MR, which indicated strong evidence that smoking heaviness reduced the odds of weight gain. ConclusionsOur findings highlight important risk factors for weight change in midlife and emphasise the public health importance of evaluating the dynamic changes to body weight within a causal inference setting.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.