Back

Gut microbiome diversity measures for metabolic conditions: a systematic scoping review

Samuthpongtorn, C.; Nopsopon, T.; Pongpirul, K.

2021-07-02 gastroenterology
10.1101/2021.06.25.21259549 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveEvidence on the association between the gut microbiome and metabolic conditions has been increasing during the past decades. Unlike the straightforward identification of beneficial non-pathogenic bacteria as a potential probiotic for clinical use, the analysis of gut microbiome diversity is more complex and required a better understanding of various measures. We aim to summarize an elaborated list of gut microbiome diversity measures. DesignSystematic search was conducted in three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials for randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and observational studies for the relationship between gut microbiota and metabolic diseases published in 2019 with the English language. ResultsThe measurement methods of alpha diversity and beta diversity were explored. Of 5929 potential studies, 47 were included in the systematic review (14632 patients). Of 13 alpha diversity measures, the Shannon index was the most commonly used in 37 studies (78.7%), followed by Chao1 index (19 studies), Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) richness (15 studies), Simpson index (13 studies), and Abundance-based Coverage Estimators (ACE) index (10 studies). Of 2 beta diversity measures, the UniFrac was the most commonly used in 24 studies (unweighted 17 studies and weighted 16 studies), followed by Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (16 studies). ConclusionVarious measurement of gut microbiome diversity have been used in the literature. All measurements have unique characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages which lead to different usage frequency. The measures were chosen considering cost, simplicity, and types of research. Significance of this studyO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this subject?C_ST_ABS{blacktriangleright} Alpha diversity, including Shannon index diversity, chao1 diversity, etc., is the average species diversity within a habitat type at a local scale while beta-diversity, such as Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and UniFrac, indicates the differentiation between microbial communities from different environments. {blacktriangleright}Alpha- and beta-diversity are the two most diverse measures of gut microbiota diversity with no consensus on which measurement methods should be used in metabolic condition study. What are the new findings?{blacktriangleright} Distinct characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of each microbiome diversity measurement method lead to a variety of usage frequencies in metabolic condition studies. Shannon diversity is the most widely used alpha diversity while there is no predilection for beta diversity. How might it impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?{blacktriangleright} Further researchers on metabolic condition with microbiome diversity measurement will have impartial evidence on which measurement methods are most rationally appropriate for their studies regarding simplicity, cost, and efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
3
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
5
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
24
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%