'Superbugs: A Pop-up Science Shop': Increasing public awareness and knowledge of antimicrobial resistance by taking science to the city
Tyrrell, J. M.; Conlon, C.; Aboklaish, A. F.; Hatch, S.; Smith, C.; Mathias, J.; Thomson, K.; Eberl, M.
Show abstract
Superbugs: A Pop-up Science Shop was a public engagement event in the school summer holidays of 2019, organised by members of Cardiff Universitys School of Medicine. We transformed an empty retail unit in the centre of Wales largest shopping centre into an interactive and immersive microbiology experience. We aimed to facilitate opportunities for two-way dialogue to impart positive impact on the awareness of antibiotic resistance, whilst concurrently evaluating the efficacy of an engagement strategy focused on the utilisation of public spaces to attract public demographics diverse to those who would normally engage with STEM outreach. Over the course of 14 days, we welcomed 6,566 visitors, with 67% attending as part of the natural footfall of the shopping centre. We created 1,625 young Antibiotic Resistance Champions, located in over 200 schools. Through a multi-lateral evaluation strategy, we were able to collect quantitative and qualitative feedback on the success of our delivery model, and the impact on our stakeholders. Herein, we will discuss the evolution of Superbugs from concept, planning and design, to the logistics of delivering an engagement event of this scale. We will focus in particular on the learning outcomes of the project, and how this will shape the future of our Superbugs project, and engagement events beyond. Key MessagesO_LICreating a multi-disciplinary core team is essential to the success of large-scale engagement events as well as the support and development of large numbers of colleagues/volunteers C_LIO_LIUtilising themes of exhibition and gameplay alongside strong fear-empowerment messages is an impactful way to confer positive influence and behaviour around antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the use of antibiotics C_LIO_LI Pop-up shop is an effective mode of delivery to capture diverse public demographics far beyond those who would traditionally engage with scientific outreach and science engagement. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Learn!Bio - A time-limited cross-sectional study on biosciences students' pathway to resilience during and post the Covid-19 pandemic at an UK university from 2020-2023 and insights into future teaching approaches. 93%
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 92%
- Stakeholders’ views on an institutional dashboard with metrics for responsible research 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving modelling for epidemic responses: reflections from members of the UK infectious disease modelling community on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- TRACKing Excess Deaths (TRACKED): an interactive online tool to monitor excess deaths associated with COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom 90%
- Limits of lockdown: characterising essential contacts during strict physical distancing 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 90%
- Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching – Evidence collated from New Delhi, India 90%
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public perceptions and interactions with UK COVID-19 Test, Trace and Isolate policies, and implications for pandemic infectious disease modelling 93%
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 91%
- Insights into the Datasets, Tools, and Training Needs of the AnVIL Community: 2024 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.