Acute biliary pancreatitis management during the COVID-19 pandemic
Colak, E.; Ciftci, A. B.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo analyze acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) management during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted with ABP patients during two discrete periods: a control period from March 16, 2019, through March 15, 2020 (period 1); and a COVID-19 era between March 16, 2020, and March 15, 2021 (period 2). ResultsA total of 89 patients with ABP were identified, 58 in period 1 and 31 in period 2, which equates to a 46.6% reduction. The mean age of the patients was 62.75{+/-}16.59 years, and 51 (57.3%) of the patients were female. qSOFA and WSES scores are significantly higher in the patients in period 2 (p=0.031, p=0.032). There were no significant differences regarding hematological parameters except lactate. Lactate levels were significantly higher in period 2 (p=0.012). Twenty-two patients (37.9%) in period 1 and six (19.3%) patients in period 2 underwent cholecystectomy (p=0.072). Cholecystectomy was performed laparoscopically in 18 (81.8%) patients in period 1 and in five (83.3%) patients in period 2 (p=0.932). There were no significant differences regarding surgical intervention between the two periods. Three patients were diagnosed COVID-19 in period 2. All of these patients died. The severity of ABP was significantly worse in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, with over 100% of patients in this group developing severe pancreatitis. Six patients (10.3%) in period 1, 10 (32.2%) patients in period 2 were admitted in ICU (p=0.010). The median length of stay was 5 (1-40) days in period 1 and 4 (2-75) days in period 2 (p= 0.641). The hospital mortality rate was 3.4% and 19.3% in period l and period 2, respectively. Mortality was significantly higher in period 2 (p=0.012). ConclusionDuring the COVID-19 outbreak, a significant decrease in the number of patients with ABP and increased severity was observed. Additionally, it can be said that SARS-CoV-2 infection has a mortal course in patients with ABP. Analysis and evaluation of ABP patients during the pandemic period is important to draw conclusions that will help confront future health crises.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 97%
- Predictors of In-hospital Mortality among Cirrhotic Patients in Ethiopia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study 96%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Procalcitonin to Predict Severity of Acute Cholangitis and Need for Urgent Biliary Decompression: Systematic Scoping Review 96%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- Integrative systems biology approach identified crucial genes and transcription factors associated with gallbladder cancer pathogenesis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A machine learning approach for identification of gastrointestinal predictors for the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization 96%
- Structural, functional and molecular dynamics analysis of cathepsin B gene SNPs associated with tropical calcific pancreatitis, a rare disease of tropics. 94%
- Ursolic acid improves the bacterial community mapping of the intestinal tract in liver fibrosis mice 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.