Back

Paradox of Predictors in Critically ill COVID-19 Patients: Outcome of a COVID-dedicated Intensive Care Unit

Nasir, M.; Perveen, R. A.; Nazneen, R.; Zahan, T.; Ahmad, S. N.; Chowdhury, A. S.

2021-04-26 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2021.04.23.21256009 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe study aimed to analyze the demographic, comorbidities, biomarkers, pharmacotherapy, and ICU-stay with the mortality outcome of COVID-19 patients admitted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in a low-middle income country, Bangladesh. MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was done in Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College Hospital from May to September 2020. All 112 patients who were admitted to ICU as COVID-19 cases (confirmed by RT-PCR of the nasopharyngeal swab) were included in the study. Demographic data, laboratory reports of predictive biomarkers, treatment schedule, and duration of ICU-stay of 99 patients were available and obtained from hospital records (non-electronic) and treatment sheets, and compared between the survived and deceased patients. ResultsOut of 99 patients admitted in ICU with COVID-19, 72 were male and 27 were female. The mean age was 61.08 years. Most of the ICU patients were in the 60 - 69 years of age group and the highest mortality rates (35.89%) were observed in this age range. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension were the predominant comorbidities in the deceased group of patients. A significant difference was observed in neutrophil count, creatinine and, NLR, d-NLR levels that raised in deceased patients. There was no significant difference as a survival outcome of antiviral drugs remdesivir or favipiravir, while the use of cephalosporin was found much higher in the survived group than the deceased group (46.66% vs 20.51%) in ICU. ConclusionsSusceptibility to developing critical illness due to COVID-19 was found more in comorbid males aged more than 60 years. There were wide variations of the biomarkers in critical COVID-19 patients in a different population, which put the healthcare workers into far more challenge to minimize the mortality in ICU in Bangladesh and around the globe during the peak of the pandemic.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
8
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Virologica Sinica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%