Comparing the efficacy of anti-infectious drugs for the treatment of mild to severe COVID-19 patients: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Debela, D. T.; Heraro, K. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 is a viral infection spreading at a great speed and has quickly caused an extensive burden to individuals, families, countries, and the world. No intervention has yet been proven highly effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Different drugs were being evaluated and reported through randomized clinical trials, and more are currently under trial. This review aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-infectious drugs with a comparator of the standard of care or placebo in patients with COVID-19. Methods and analysisTwo independent review authors will extract data and assess a risk of bias using RoB2. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) that evaluate single and/or combined antiviral drugs recommended by WHO latest guideline for the treatment of COVID-19 will be included. We will search for Pub Med, the Cochrane Center for Clinical Trial database (CENTRAL), clinicaltrials.gov, etc. databases for articles published in the English language between December 2019 to April 2021. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) involving Network Meta-analysis guidelines for the design and reporting of the results. The primary endpoints will be time to clinical recovery and time to RNA negativity. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE extension of NMA. Data analysis will be performed using the frequentist NMA approach with netmeta package implemented in R. Ethics and disseminationThere are no ethical considerations associated with this study as we will use publicly available data from previously published studies. We plan to publish results in open access peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO registration numberID=CRD42021230919. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThis will be the first systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy specific to anti-infectious drugs category for for mild to severe patients of COVID-19. C_LIO_LIIts compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Protocols (PRISMA-P) involving network meta-analysis(NMA) will ensure the quality of reporting. C_LIO_LIDoing both pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) can comprehensively analyse direct and indirect comparison results of different anti-infectious drugs for COVID 19 will give more reliable conclusions aswell as the rank of those drugs. C_LIO_LIThere is risk of heterogeneity and inconsistency, given the different anti-infectious drugs that will be included; however, we try to control intransitivity by carefully identifying the eligibility criteria depending on PICOS strategy and assess inconsistency using local as well as global approaches. C_LIO_LIThe limitation of this study is it will not explore the economic benefits of these drugs. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 95%
- Favipiravir for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) patients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials 94%
- Efficacy of remdesivir versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 95%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 95%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19, A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. 94%
- Hydroxychloroquine for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in health care workers: a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial (HERO-HCQ) 92%
- Efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Japan: A large observational study using the COVID-19 Registry Japan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Review and methodological analysis of trials currently testing treatment and prevention options for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) globally. 94%
- Antiviral drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 - the DisCoVeRy trial 93%
- A placebo-controlled double blind trial of hydroxychloroquine in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Repurposing Existing Medications for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Protocol for a Rapid and Living Systematic Review 94%
- Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection: a protocol for a systematic review of observational studies 93%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.