So you want to be a Super Researcher?
Rathee, S.; Lee, S. L.
Show abstract
Publishing original scientific research is inherent to the work of a researcher. However, the pressure to maintain productivity and scientific impact can lead to research group publishing excessively, negatively affecting the mental health of a researcher. Ph.D. students and early career researchers are particularly susceptible to this pressure due to the inherent vulnerability of their positions. At present, there are no resources that concisely summarise the publication culture of a research group to help the researcher make an informed decision before joining. In this article, we present the Super Researcher app, an R Shiny application(app) with a user-friendly interface. Using text-mining methodology to extract publicly available author data from Scopus, this pilot app has four fundamental functions to provide snapshot information that will help researchers grasp the publication culture of a research group within minutes. The Super Researcher app provides information on: 1) institution data, 2) authors publication, 3) co-author network plots and 4) publication journals. The Super Researcher app is built on R shiny which provides an interactive interface to users. This app utilizes the Big Data framework Apache Spark to mine relevant information from a huge author information database. The authors information is stored and manipulated using both SQL(SQLite) and NoSQL(HBase) databases. Hbase is used for local data storage and manipulation while SQLite feeds data to the R Shiny interface. In this paper, we introduce these functionalities and illustrate how this information can help guide a researcher to select a new Principle Investigator (PI) with better compatibility in terms of publication attitude using a case study. Available: https://researchmind.co.uk/super-researcher/
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Academic Tracker: Software for Tracking and Reporting Publications Associated with Authors and Grants 97%
- Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: a survey of bioRxiv authors 93%
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 91%
- A scalable and robust system for Audience EEG recordings 89%
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inflated citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project 93%
- Insights into the Datasets, Tools, and Training Needs of the AnVIL Community: 2024 93%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative monitoring of nucleotide sequence data from genetic resources in context of their citation in the scientific literature 94%
- Myth-busting the provider-user relationship for digital sequence information 93%
- FAIR Data Station for Lightweight Metadata Management & Validation of Omics Studies 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.