Back

Ultra-short-wave diathermy shortens the course of moderate and severe COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial

huang, l.; li, q.; Sayed, S. Z. A.; Mohammad, N.; chen, b.; Iftikhar, M. A.; Xie, L.; Hu, J.; chen, h.

2021-02-01 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2021.01.28.21250163 medRxiv
Show abstract

QuestionIs ultra-short-wave diathermy (USWD) safe and effective in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ? DesignSingle-centre, evaluator-blinded, two-arm, parallel design, randomized controlled clinical trial. ParticipantsModerate and severe COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory syndrome. InterventionUSWD for 10 minutes twice daily for 12 consecutive days along with standard medical treatment (USWD group, n = 25), versus standard medical treatment alone (control group, n = 25). Outcome measuresThe primary outcomes were the duration of recovery and negative conversion rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Secondary outcomes included clinical status (seven-category ordinal and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) scores), computed tomography (CT), routine blood tests, and adverse events. ResultsTime to clinical recovery (USWD 36.84{+/-}9.93 vs. control 43.56{+/-}12.15, P = 0.037) was significantly shortened with a between-group difference of 6.72 days. Clinical status was improved with significant between-group differences on day 28 (SIRS, P = 0.011; seven-category scale, P = 0.003). The rate of RNA negative conversion at days 7 (P = 0.066), 14 (P = 0.239), 21 (P = 0.269), and 28 (P = 0.490) was statistically insignificant. Moreover, insignificant differences were observed in the artificial intelligence-assisted CT analysis. No treatment-associated adverse events or worsening of pulmonary fibrosis were observed. ConclusionUSWD, as adjunctive therapy, shortened the recovery course and improved clinical status of patients with COVID-19 without aggravating pulmonary fibrosis. the findings are limited due to the small sample size and early termination. RegistrationChiCTR2000029972

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.