Predicting severity of Covid-19 using standard laboratory parameters
Buchmueller, T.; Groening, I.; Ihl, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundMore than 1.6 million people have already deceased due to a COVID-19 infection making it a major public health concern. A prediction of severe courses can enhance treatment quality and thus lower fatality and morbidity rates. The use of laboratory parameters has recently been established for a prediction. However, laboratory parameters have rarely been used in combination to predict severe outcomes. MethodWe used a retrospective case-control design to analyze risk factors derived from laboratory parameters. Patients treated for COVID-19 at an hospital in Krefeld, Germany, from March to May 2020 were included (n =42). Patients were classified into two categories based on their outcome (Mild course vs. treatment in intensive care unit). Laboratory parameters were compared across severity categories using non-parametric statistic. Identified laboratory parameters were used in a logistic regression model. The model was replicated using a) clinical standardized parameters b) aggregated factors derived from a factor analysis. ResultsPatients in intensive care unit showed elevated ALT, CRP and LDH levels, a higher leukocyte and neutrophile count, a higher neutrophile ratio and a lowered lymphocyte ratio. We were able to classify 95.1% of all cases correctly (96.6% of mild and 91.7% of severe cases, p<.001). ConclusionA number of routinely collected laboratory parameters is associated with a severe outcome of COVID-19. The combination of these parameters provides a powerful tool in predicting severity and can enhance treatment effectiveness.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 viremia precedes an IL6 response in severe COVID-19 patients: results of a longitudinal prospective cohort 94%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering ICU patients with sepsis based on the patterns of their circulating biomarkers: a secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study 96%
- Assessing the impact of the Gamma variant on COVID-19 Patient admissions in a Southern Brazilian tertiary hospital - A comparison of dual pandemic phases 95%
- Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a physiology-based approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 97%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 96%
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between dysnatraemia during hospitalisation and post COVID-19 mental fatigue 95%
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 94%
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of body mass index on SAPS3 prognostic performance in critically ill patients from Brazil 94%
- Severe COVID-19 is characterised by inflammation and immature myeloid cells early in disease progression 93%
- IL-6 and IL-10 as predictors of disease severity in COVID 19 patients: Results from Meta-analysis and Regression 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.