Back

Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Covid 19: A metanalysis of case series studies

Mohamed hussain, s.; Ayesha Farhana, S.; Alwutayd, O.; Alnafeesah, A.; Alshammari, M.; Alnasser, S.; Krishnadas, N.

2020-08-15 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2020.08.12.20173682 medRxiv
Show abstract

Backgroundcharacteristic feature of COVID-19 during its progression in severity is the cytokine storm (via interleukin-6, IL-6) which is responsible for secondary acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [4]. Tocilizumab has an antagonist effect on the IL-6 receptor. With present review and metanalysis, we intend to update the current status on the clinical efficacy of tocilizumab in the treatment of Covid 19 infections in the published literature of case series. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe following inclusion criteria were used: (i) case series studies (number of reported patients in each study equal to or greater than ten (ii) use of tocilizumab alone or in combination with standard of care therapy (iii) Covid 19 adult patients (iv) the studies with endpoints on all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, clinical improvements. Data synthesis and statistical analysisMeta-analysis was performed using a random effects model and the DerSimonian and Laird method. RESULTS18 were selected for the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). 14 studies were retrospective and 4 were prospective Meta-analysisThe mortality rate of COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab was 21% (251/1212) Asymmetric funnel plot in the cylindrical form due to publication bias In conclusionthe present synthesis provide us useful insights with the other available evidence to refine our strategy and equip ourselves effectively with tocilizumab to defeat COVID 19 to save humanity. LimitationsThe included studies utilized varied doses of tocilizumab (single or double), and duration drug availability issues emerged in some centers, which may have influenced both sample sizes and study designs. Clinical implicationsIncorporated studies without control groups into systematic reviews and quantitative synthesis especially when there are no other studies to consider can provide information for formulating effective treatment strategies for management of COVID 19 infections through the use of tocilizumab.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.7%
2
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%