Back

Network reinforcement driven drug repurposing for COVID-19 by exploiting disease-gene-drug associations

Nam, Y.; Yun, J.-S.; Lee, S. M.; Park, J. W.; Chen, Z.; Lee, B.; Verma, A.; Ning, X.; Shen, L.; Kim, D.

2020-08-14 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2020.08.11.20173120
Show abstract

Currently, the number of patients with COVID-19 has significantly increased. Thus, there is an urgent need for developing treatments for COVID-19. Drug repurposing, which is the process of reusing already-approved drugs for new medical conditions, can be a good way to solve this problem quickly and broadly. Many clinical trials for COVID-19 patients using treatments for other diseases have already been in place or will be performed at clinical sites in the near future. Additionally, patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, liver cirrhosis, kidney diseases, hypertension, and asthma are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19. Thus, the relationship of comorbidity disease with COVID-19 may help to find repurposable drugs. To reduce trial and error in finding treatments for COVID-19, we propose building a network-based drug repurposing framework to prioritize repurposable drugs. First, we utilized knowledge of COVID-19 to construct a disease-gene-drug network (DGDr-Net) representing a COVID-19-centric interactome with components for diseases, genes, and drugs. DGDr-Net consisted of 592 diseases, 26,681 human genes and 2,173 drugs, and medical information for 18 common comorbidities. The DGDr-Net recommended candidate repurposable drugs for COVID-19 through network reinforcement driven scoring algorithms. The scoring algorithms determined the priority of recommendations by utilizing graph-based semi-supervised learning. From the predicted scores, we recommended 30 drugs, including dexamethasone, resveratrol, methotrexate, indomethacin, quercetin, etc., as repurposable drugs for COVID-19, and the results were verified with drugs that have been under clinical trials. The list of drugs via a data-driven computational approach could help reduce trial-and-error in finding treatment for COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 0.1%
15.8%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 4%
15.8%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
based on 19 papers
Top 0.4%
7.8%
5
Briefings in Bioinformatics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 66%
5.5%
7
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 1%
4.8%
8
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 7%
3.0%
9
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.9%
2.5%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 7%
2.3%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 5%
1.8%
13
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 13%
1.4%
15
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 34%
1.4%
17
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
18
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 21%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 15%
0.8%
22
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 4%
0.7%