Methods for combining multiple correlated biomarkers with application to the study of low-grade inflammation and muscle mass in senior horses
Vsevolozhskaya, O.; Herbst, A.; Adams, A.; Burns, C.; Cantu, B.; Barker, V.; Zaykin, D.
Show abstract
The simplest analysis of biomarker data is based on a series of single biomarker hypothesis tests, followed by correction for multiple testing. However, it is intuitively plausible that a joint analysis of multiple biomarkers will have higher statistical power and promise improved discrimination over tests based on single markers. In this article, we study analytical properties of the approach for joint analysis of correlated summary statistics based on the test for quadratic forms (TQ). Based on the derivation of the TQ-distribution, we proposed a scale-location approximation of the TQ statistic, which we call approximate TQ. We show that the approximate TQ has very similar power to the traditional TQ test under varying correlation structures among biomarkers. Our application of both the TQ and the approximate TQ test to data on biomarkers for inflamm-aging - an age-related low-grade chronic inflammation - reveals an association between the percentage of IFN{gamma} positive lymphocytes and overall muscle condition in senior horses.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Partition Quantitative Assessment (PQA): A quantitative methodology to assess the embedded noise in clustered omics and systems biology data 90%
- Impact of long-term storage on mid-infrared spectral patterns of serum and synovial fluid samples of dogs with osteoarthritis 90%
- Male-Female Disparities in Years of Potential Life Lost Attributable to COVID-19 in the United States: A State-by-State Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.