Back

Biological age measured by DNA methylation clocks and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tay, J. H.; Barros, D.; Dong, J.; Choudhury, S.; Bakulaite, A.; Wang, W.; Maier, A. B.

2026-10-21 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.10.20.26365864 medRxiv
Show abstract

This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the association between DNA methylation (DNAm) age and all-cause and disease-specific mortality risks in adults. A systematic search of six databases from Jan 1 2011 to April 15 2026 identified articles assessing the association of DNAm age measures and all-cause or disease-specific mortality in adults from general or disease-specific populations. Effect sizes were pooled as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using inverse-variance random-effects models. Of 42 023 records screened, 125 articles (380 705 participants) met the inclusion criteria, with 53 included in meta-analyses. Overall, 48 distinct DNAm clocks were evaluated. Higher DNAm ages were associated with higher risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality risks. In general populations, GrimAge epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) showed consistent associations across mortality outcomes, with each 1 year higher GrimAge EAA associated with ~6-10% higher all-cause (31 cohorts, n=53 642, HR per SD: 1.46 [95% CI 1.38, 1.55], HR per 1-year: 1.09 [95% CI 1.08, 1.11], I^2=84.1%, p-value=1.21 x 10^(-14)), cardiovascular (6 cohorts, n=30 751, HR per SD: 1.55 [95% CI 1.38, 1.73], HR per 1-year: 1.10 [95% CI 1.07, 1.13], I^2=28.0%, p-value=1.71 x 10^(-4)), and cancer (5 cohorts, n=27 187, HR per SD: 1.31 [95% CI 1.15, 1.50], HR per 1-year: 1.06 [95% CI 1.03, 1.10], I^2=33.6%, p-value=4.76 x 10^(-3)) mortality. Clocks incorporating additional surrogates and technical refinements showed numerically larger pooled associations than their original counterparts. GrimAge2 (HR per SD: 1.65 [95% CI 1.53, 1.77] vs 1.46 [1.38, 1.55]) and PCGrimAge (1.56 [1.36, 1.78] vs 1.51 [1.32, 1.74]) showed higher pooled HR association with all-cause mortality than GrimAge. Further work is warranted to evaluate the responsiveness of DNAm clocks to interventions and potential clinical utility.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.