Back

APOE ε4 Modifies the Association of Left Atrial Remodeling With Brain Aging

Badea, A.; Xu, J.; Laskowitz, D. T.; Badea, C. T.

2026-10-20 neurology
10.64898/2026.10.14.26365550 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTION: Whether APOE e4 modifies relationships between subclinical cardiac phenotypes and brain structure is unknown. METHODS: In Framingham Heart Study Offspring participants, we related antecedent echocardiographic remodeling (Examinations 4-6) to repeated brain MRI, and cardiac magnetic resonance phenotypes to regional cortical morphometry, testing cardiac x APOE e4 interactions with false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction and permutation testing of the regional screen. RESULTS: APOE e4 modified the association between antecedent left atrial (LA) remodeling and subsequent lateral ventricular expansion (beta=-0.00858, P=1.45 x 10^-4, q=0.0023; N=1,305; 3,787 MRI observations), the only FDR-significant result of 16 longitudinal tests, including with participant-specific MRI-time slopes (q=0.034); it weakened when intracranial volume x MRI time was modeled. Four regional ventricular cardiac x APOE e4 interactions met within-family FDR criteria, but their number was consistent with chance (permutation P=0.70). Maximum LA volume index showed an APOE e4-dependent association with left middle-occipital cortical-thickness variability (whole-brain q=0.017; permutation P=0.041) that persisted after ventricular adjustment. Cardiac phenotypes and trajectories showed no FDR-significant APOE e4-dependent associations with plasma Abeta42/40, p-tau181, GFAP, or NfL, and adjustment for these biomarkers changed the regional interactions by at most 3.2%. Allen Human Brain Atlas data showed cholesterol-biosynthesis enrichment in the right superior frontal cortex, implicated by the LV end-systolic volume interaction, but without convergent pathway evidence. DISCUSSION: APOE e4 modified atrial-brain relationships, with the strongest evidence linking antecedent atrial remodeling to later ventricular expansion. Replication with prespecified models is needed.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.