Mapping scientific cosmopolitanism: scientists with publication records substantially split across multiple countries
Ioannidis, J.; Baas, J.
Show abstract
We used Scopus data on 243949 top-cited scientists to map scientific cosmopolitanism defined as having at least two different countries that contribute alone at least 10 percent of an author published record as indexed in Scopus. 20.4 percent of the top-cited authors were cosmopolitan based on this definition. Based on current author affiliation, rates varied widely from 9% to 76% across countries with at least 250 top-cited authors. Countries with few top-cited authors had almost always high rates of cosmopolitanism. The proportion of top-cited authors who are cosmopolitan has steadily increased over time in younger generations among those who started publishing after 1965 reaching 43% recently. Large differences were also seen across scientific subfields from 1% in General Psychology and Cognitive Sciences to 46% in Econometrics. Across the 30 country pairs that were most over-represented, countries shared borders, languages, most common religion pairs, or any of these features in 15, 19, 26, and 29 cases, respectively. The map of cosmopolitan authors reveals a large and increasing proportion of the most influential scientists who share two or more scientific homes that each has made a substantial contribution to their career. Cosmopolitanism among scientists requires better study to help facilitate its potential positive contributions not only to individual scientists but to science and society more broadly.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Digitalization impacts the COVID-19 pandemic and the stringency of government measures 89%
- Full Publication of Preprint Articles in Prevention Research: An Analysis of Publication Proportions and Results Consistency 89%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transparency and open science reporting guidelines in sleep research and chronobiology journals 91%
- Improving modelling for epidemic responses: reflections from members of the UK infectious disease modelling community on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 87%
- TRACKing Excess Deaths (TRACKED): an interactive online tool to monitor excess deaths associated with COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.