Back

Modelling shiftwork and sleep fragmentation in mice: behavioural phenotypes and implications for hippocampal neurogenesis

Gibson, R. M.; Yildirim, T.; Simon, K.; Yue, J.; Tok, S.; Mistlberger, R.; Kent, B. A.

2026-10-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.09.26.754534 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sleep disturbances compromise cognition, and overall physical and mental health; however, animal models of these effects remain limited, and typically impose more extreme disturbances than those experienced by humans. Here, we use behavioural interventions in mice to model two common types of sleep disruption: (1) sleep displacement associated with shiftwork and (2) sleep fragmentation associated with aging and disease. C57BL6/J mice were subjected to either a sleep deprivation protocol (n = 8, females = 4) or a fragmentation protocol (n = 8, females = 4), in which they were completely deprived of sleep or awoken every 2 min respectively, for 12 hours during their typical rest phase (lights-on) across 7 consecutive days. Age-matched control mice (n = 14, females = 7) remained undisturbed in their home cages. Activity during the 12-hour active phase was recorded via infrared motion sensors. After protocol completion, mice were injected with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU, 200mg/kg) 2 hours prior to brain and blood collection; hippocampal neurogenesis and plasma corticosterone were then assessed. Results show that the sleep deprivation and fragmentation protocols had different, dynamic effects on behaviour; sleep deprivation was associated with an accumulating sleep need, operationalized as progressively reduced locomotor activity across the week, whereas fragmentation produced only an acute reduction of locomotor activity. Cell proliferation rates and corticosterone did not differ from controls. These protocols provide a foundation for future research into the mechanistic links between shiftwork and sleep fragmentation on health and cognition.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.