Brain age prediction from structural and functional connectivity across the lifespan using connectome-based predictive modeling
McCusker, M. C.; Dadashkarimi, J.; Sun, H.; Rosenblatt, M.; Scheinost, D.
Show abstract
Brain maturation and aging are characterized by widespread changes in structural and functional brain organization. The extent to which these modalities capture shared versus distinct signatures of lifespan development and aging remains unclear. In this study, we applied connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) to connectomes derived from diffusion MRI and resting-state functional MRI in Human Connectome Project Development, Young Adult, Aging, and combined Lifespan cohorts to predict chronological age. Both structural and functional connectomes significantly predicted age across cohorts, demonstrating that age-related information is distributed throughout whole-brain connectivity patterns. Prediction performance varied across lifespan stages, with generally stronger performance in the Development, Aging, and Lifespan cohorts than in Young Adulthood. Structural and functional models produced significantly correlated predicted ages in several cohorts, indicating shared age-related information across modalities. Structural-functional convergence analyses revealed limited and variable correspondence between modality-specific predictive features, suggesting that structural and functional connectomes capture both shared and complementary aspects of brain maturation and aging. Network-level analyses demonstrated that age-predictive information was distributed across canonical brain networks, including cerebellar, frontoparietal, salience, somatomotor, and subcortical networks, with patterns varying across cohorts and modalities. Multimodal CPM improved prediction relative to unimodal models in several cohorts, supporting the complementary contribution of structural and functional connectivity to age prediction. Cross-cohort, cross-sex, and cross-modality analyses further characterized the generalizability and shared information of predictive models across lifespan stages, sexes, and imaging modalities. This work demonstrates the utility of CPM for characterizing distributed structural and functional connectivity patterns associated with chronological age across the lifespan and provides a foundation for future studies of individual variability in brain maturation and aging.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal stability of the brain functional connectome is associated with episodic memory performance in aging 97%
- Targeting age-related differences in brain and cognition with multimodal imaging and connectome topography profiling 97%
- Joint contributions of cortical morphometry and white matter microstructure in healthy brain aging: A partial least squares correlation analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individualized Mapping of Functional Brain Networks in Older Adulthood 98%
- Brain-wide functional connectome analysis of 40,000 individuals reveals brain networks that show aging effects in older adults 97%
- White matter tract microstructure, macrostructure, and associated cortical gray matter morphology across the lifespan 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuronal microstructural changes in the human brain are associated with neurocognitive aging 95%
- Epigenetic age acceleration predicts subject-specific white matter degeneration in the human brain. 95%
- AnthropoAge, a novel approach to integrate body composition into the estimation of biological age 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond brain size: disentangling the effect of sex and brain size on brain morphometry and cognitive functioning 95%
- Complementary value of molecular, phenotypic and functional aging biomarkers in dementia prediction 93%
- Testing retrogenesis and physiological explanations for tract-wise white matter aging: links to developmental order, fibre calibre, and vascularization 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.