Back

Benchmarking single-cell foundation models for aging biology

Ni, X.; Liang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, L.; Shen, X.; Yang, M.; Xu, R.; Li, H.; Ji, R.; Jin, C.; Ni, S.

2026-09-27 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.21.753191 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single cell foundation models (scFMs) provide representations of cellular states, but their utility across biological questions in aging research remains unclear. We established a benchmark of cellular representations for aging research, evaluating ten general-purpose scFMs, three aging-specific models and conventional methods across five biological questions using more than 2.5 million single cell transcriptomes. Using frozen pretrained representations, Geneformer performed best among scFMs for chronological age prediction and age pseudotime concordance, although 2,000 highly variable genes achieved higher mean performance. Several scFMs captured positive molecular age shifts across three disease contexts, consistent with reported aging-associated changes. SCimilarity performed well for rare cellular state identification across out-of-distribution datasets, exceeding aging specific models and conventional baselines. At the gene level, scGPT showed the highest recovery of reference TF target interactions, including aging-related regulatory hubs. Overall, scFMs supported diverse aging analyses, but performance depended on the biological question, highlighting their utility for rare cellular state identification and regulatory analysis.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.