Understanding urgent blood-donor mobilisability: a cross-sectional online survey of digitally reachable adults in Ghana
Shen, H.; Agorinya, I. A.; Ayanore, M. A.; Brede, M.; Chapman, A.; Head, M.
Show abstract
Introduction Safe and timely blood availability remains a major global health challenge, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Digital tools may accelerate donor contact, but digital reachability alone does not ensure that people will notice, trust and act on urgent requests to support blood donation efforts. We examined factors associated with anticipated engagement in digitally coordinated urgent blood-donor mobilisation among digitally reachable adults in Ghana. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey from September 2025 to January 2026 across Ghana's 16 regions. Participants were recruited via Facebook advertising and snowball sampling. Factors associated with urgent blood-donor mobilisability were assessed under four criteria: high future-donation willingness; high willingness to install a trusted donation app; high willingness to respond to a trusted urgent-request; and high practical flexibility to leave current activities. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression examined prevalence and associated factors. Results Among 1,067 participants, 577 (54.1%) met all four criteria. Future-donation willingness (91.8%), trusted-app installation willingness (83.2%) and trusted-request response willingness (82.7%) were common, whereas practical flexibility was lower (66.6%). In the adjusted model, high formal health-system trust (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.95, 95% CI 2.08-7.50), high digital-response readiness (AOR 2.26, 1.66-3.08), previous donation (AOR 1.47, 1.08-2.01), high donation knowledge (AOR 1.42, 1.03-1.97) and willingness to donate to strangers were positively associated with high mobilisability. Women (AOR 0.60, 0.43-0.83), participants reporting a work-schedule barrier (AOR 0.43, 0.29-0.66) and those travelling over 30 min to the nearest healthcare facility at night (AOR 0.66, 0.45-0.96) had lower adjusted odds. Conclusions Digital reachability and stated donation willingness may overestimate the population pool available for emergency donation. Digital blood-donor solutions should consider verifiable health-system requests, account for response readiness and current availability, and connect willing individuals with accessible collection options and transport support where needed.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rethinking Paediatric Sepsis Care through Local Provider Voices and Lived Systems: A Mixed-Methods Study in Two Hospitals in Ghana 91%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 91%
- Effects of a multimedia campaign on HIV self-testing and PrEP outcomes among young people in South Africa: A mixed-methods impact evaluation of ‘MTV Shuga Down South’ 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Gender-Intentional Implementation of Digital Health Information for Immunization in Ethiopia 93%
- The Humanitarian-Development Nexus and Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions in Fragile Settings: A Scoping Review 91%
- Willingness and Perceived ability to pay for Ugandas Proposed National Health Insurance Scheme among Informal Sector workers in Iganga and Mayuge districts, Uganda: A Contingent Valuation Method. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing uptake of COVID-19 diagnostics in Sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid scoping review 91%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 91%
- Drivers and Determinants of Extreme Humanitarian Needs among Rohingya Refugee Households: Evidence from UNHCRs Multi-Sectoral Needs Analysis. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 91%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 91%
- A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviors among adults in Senegal 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Retrospective mortality and prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in greater Omdurman, Sudan: a population–based cross–sectional survey 89%
- Impact of Social Distancing Measures on COVID-19 Healthcare Demand in Central Texas 89%
- Potential roles of social distancing in mitigating the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in South Korea 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.