Back

Entorhinal grid coding as a functional link between tau accumulation and episodic memory in human aging

Segen, V.; Belge Bernard, T.; Callau Navarro, G.; Bahrd, P.; Behrenbruch, N.; Schumann-Werner, B.; Schwarck, S.; Garcia-Garcia, B.; Barthel, H.; Sabri, O.; Kreissl, M. C.; Duzel, E.; Maass, A.; Wolbers, T.

2026-09-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.26.747192 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Episodic memory decline is a common feature of cognitively normal aging, but its extent varies markedly across individuals. Although entorhinal tau pathology is thought to be a key contributor to episodic memory impairment, the neural mechanisms linking early tau accumulation to memory differences remain unclear. Grid-cell computations in the entorhinal cortex, which provide scaffolds for organizing experiences into episodic memories, offer one candidate mechanism. Here, we combined virtual-reality functional MRI, multivariate analysis, tau PET, and delayed word-list recall in cognitively normal older adults to test whether tau-related alterations in entorhinal coding are associated with worse episodic memory. Weaker left entorhinal grid-cell-like signal was associated with poorer memory performance, and individuals with higher left entorhinal tau burden showed weaker grid-cell-like signal. This association was specific to the canonical six-fold signal and was not explained by entorhinal volume, mean diffusivity, or intracortical myelination. A cross-sectional Bayesian mediation analysis further demonstrated that bilateral medial temporal tau burden is related to memory indirectly through left entorhinal grid-cell-like signal. Together, these findings provide evidence that entorhinal grid codes may constitute a functional pathway linking tau accumulation to memory variability in normal aging.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.