Back

Perceptions of Equity, Challenges, and Identity-Based Differences Among U.S. Entomologists

Barros Bustos, S. H.; Chicas-Mosier, A.; Abramson, C.

2026-08-24 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.08.18.745652 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed to examine entomologists' perceptions of equity, inclusion, and exclusion within the discipline, identifying perceived challenges and proposed solutions for advancing equity in the field. The present study surveyed 47 self-identified entomologists living in the United States in 2023. Using a mixed-methods design, the study examined entomologists' perceptions of inclusion and exclusion within the discipline through qualitative and quantitative measures. Respondents highlighted needs for race-conscious funding opportunities, comprehensive inclusion efforts through geographically diverse outreach, and access to role models and mentors with similar identities to future entomologists. Findings are discussed in relation to a smaller 2013 study on recruitment and retention of entomologists of color, which offers preliminary historical context. The 2013 respondents emphasized intrinsic and age-based barriers to recruitment (e.g., lack of interest, limited K-12 outreach), the 2023 findings point toward structural inequities and retention needs (e.g., systemic exclusion). The 2013 comparison is interpreted as exploratory given differences in sample size and scope between the two studies. The 2023 study highlights evolving perceptions of persistent inequities in entomology and identifies opportunities to build a more inclusive and representative discipline.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.