Epigenetics for Public Consumption: Evaluating Science Communication Strategies and Practices on YouTube
Raisa, A.; Santaliz-Moreno, I.; Ayala, A.; Hamilton, J. G.; McQueen, A.; Souroullas, G. P.; Maki, J.; Waters, E. A.
Show abstract
Background: Epigenetics, the study of reversible changes in gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence, is increasingly applied in medical, commercial, and policy contexts. Yet, little is known about how this emerging science is communicated to the public. The purpose of this study was to examine communication strategies, sources, and modalities in epigenetic-related videos on YouTube- the most accessed platform for informal science education. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods content analysis of 294 YouTube videos on epigenetics by conducting a keyword-based search on October 17, 2023. Video transcripts and meta-data were coded using a codebook developed both deductively and inductively. Qualitative analysis examined how communication strategies were used within videos and identified emergent themes (RQ1). Quantitative analyses examined the frequency of video and channel characteristics (RQ2), and presentation modalities (RQ3). Results: Findings reveal poor alignment with science communication best practices (RQ1): over 92% of videos failed to acknowledge scientific uncertainty, the comprehensibility level exceeded the recommended 8th-grade level (e.g., average readability grade 10.7), and professional research organizations were notably absent. Narrators were mostly male (56.7%) and white-presenting (73.7%) (RQ2). The majority of the videos used multi-modal strategies (e.g., visual texts mixed with animation and voice-over narration) to communicate epigenetic information (RQ3). Conclusion: Findings highlight the need for professional research organizations to be more proactive in public epigenetic communication efforts. Increasing narrator demographic diversity could broaden audience reach. Evidence-based communication tools are needed for health or science communicators discussing epigenetics on social media.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists 92%
- Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists' use and perception of preprints 92%
- Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers' opinions on success indicators 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 89%
- Perceptions of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine: Insights from a Large-Scale International Cross-Sectional Survey of Surgery Researchers and Clinicians 87%
- Twitter and Census Data Analytics to Explore Socioeconomic Factors for Post-COVID-19 Reopening Sentiment 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Pathway Integrator: a framework of meta-analytic integration of multiple transcriptomic studies for consensual and differential pathway analysis 83%
- Small RNA Sequencing Reveals a Distinct MicroRNA Signature between Glucocorticoid Responder and Glucocorticoid Non-responder Primary Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells after Dexamethasone Treatment 83%
- Unveiling sex-based differences in the effects of alcohol abuse: a comprehensive functional meta-analysis of transcriptomic studies 82%
Similar papers in this journal
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 89%
- Open-loop lab-on-a-chip technology enables remote computer science training in Latinx life sciences students 88%
- Full Publication of Preprint Articles in Prevention Research: An Analysis of Publication Proportions and Results Consistency 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.