An Exploratory Stability Selection (ESS) Framework for Robust Predictor Discovery: An Application to Physical Resilience in Aging Populations
Ashner, M. C.; Kraus, V. B.; Whitson, H. E.; Simon, C.; Huebner, J. L.; Bareja, A.; Perfect, C. R.; Pietrosimone, L.; Hall, K. S.; Colon-Emeric, C. S.; Peskoe, S. B.
Show abstract
Identifying biological and clinical signals that consistently predict physical resilience, defined as one's ability to maintain or regain function following a health stressor, is essential for advancing precision approaches to aging and recovery. High-dimensional datasets hold tremendous promise but pose analytic challenges due to correlation, distributed signals, instability, and sensitivity to analytic choices. The complexity of these data requires strategies that prioritize transparency and stability in variable selection. We present a resampling-based statistical framework, the Exploratory Stability Selection (ESS) framework, designed for hypothesis-generating predictor discovery. ESS is an ensemble-style variable selection technique that integrates multiple resampling strategies and sparsity levels, enabling exploration of robustness and context-dependence across diverse data perturbations. We demonstrate the utilization of the ESS framework with a data example using the PRIME-KNEE study, which examines physical resilience in older adults undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty. ESS analyses were applied to clinical-only, plasma biomarker-only, and combined predictor sets to evaluate the stability and competitiveness of candidate variables associated with the probability of having a highly resilient recovery trajectory for pain interference. The data example highlights how ESS distinguishes highly stable predictors from context-dependent signals whose selection varies with predictor competition and analytic configuration. ESS retains configuration-level results and summarizes stability metrics across configurations to provide insight into the subsequent prioritization and validation of candidate predictors. This framework is well-suited for hypothesis-generating variable selection problems common to exploratory resilience research and other aging-related applications that involve complex, multi-domain predictor sets.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing And Internally Validating AI-Based Aging Resilience Biomarkers in Non-Human Primates 93%
- A Bayesian Network Analysis of Gait Speed Change Upon Transition to Uneven Surfaces in Older Adults 92%
- Improving Statistical Rigor in Animal Aging Research by Addressing Clustering and Nesting Effects: Illustration with the National Institute on Aging's Intervention Testing Program Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A New Sparse Bayesian Quantile Neural Network-based Approach and Its Application to Discover Physiological Sweet Spots in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging 94%
- A novel approach of human geroprotector discovery by targeting the converging subnetworks of aging and age-related diseases 92%
- Functional assessments of short-term spatial memory in the Dog Aging Project identify strong associations with age that are not moderated by body mass 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Increased Telomere Length and Aging-related Physical and Cognitive Traits in the UK Biobank 91%
- Associations of Loneliness and Social Isolation with Healthspan and Lifespan in the US Health and Retirement Study 90%
- Antecedent Metabolic Health and Metformin (ANTHEM) Aging study: Rationale and study design for a randomized controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying time series analyses on continuous accelerometry data: a clinical example in older adults with and without cognitive impairment 92%
- Education Shapes the Link Between EEG Aperiodic Components and Cognitive Aging 92%
- Social Determinants of Healthy Aging: An Investigation using the All of Us Cohort 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.